Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31592438›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2019

Breast MRI radiomics for the pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients.

Karen Drukker, Alexandra Edwards, Christopher Doyle, John Papaioannou, Kirti Kulkarni, Maryellen L Giger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel Radiomic Measurements of Tumor-Associated Vasculature Morphology on Clinical Imaging as a Biomarker of Treatment Response in Multiple Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. SPIE Computer-Aided Diagnosis conference anniversary review.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Radiomics in surgical oncology: applications and challenges.Computer assisted surgery (Abingdon, England) · 2021
    Review
  15. Value ofEJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  16. Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen DrukkerUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-3476
Alexandra EdwardsUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Christopher DoyleUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0162-2798
John PapaioannouUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Kirti KulkarniUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Maryellen L GigerUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-9728

Funding

Quantitative Image Analysis for Assessing Response to Breast Cancer TherapyU01CA195564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate breast MRI radiomics in predicting, prior to any treatment, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with invasive lymph node (LN)-positive breast cancer for two tasks: (1) prediction of pathologic complete response and (2) prediction of post-NAC LN status. Our study included 158 patients, with 19 showing post-NAC complete pathologic response (pathologic TNM stage T0,N0,MX) and 139 showing incomplete response. Forty-two patients were post-NAC LN-negative, and 116 were post-NAC LN-positive. We further analyzed prediction of response by hormone receptor subtype of the primary cancer (77 hormone receptor-positive, 39 HER2-enriched, 38 triple negative, and 4 cancers with unknown receptor status). Only pre-NAC MRIs underwent computer analysis, initialized by an expert breast radiologist indicating index cancers and metastatic axillary sentinel LNs on DCE-MRI images. Forty-nine computer-extracted radiomics features were obtained, both for the primary cancers and for the metastatic sentinel LNs. Since the dataset contained MRIs acquired at 1.5 T and at 3.0 T, we eliminated features affected by magnet strength using the Mann-Whitney U-test with the null-hypothesis that 1.5 T and 3.0 T samples were selected from populations having the same distribution. Bootstrapping and ROC analysis were used to assess performance of individual features in the two classification tasks. Eighteen features appeared unaffected by magnet strength. Pre-NAC tumor features generally appeared uninformative in predicting response to therapy. In contrast, some pre-NAC LN features were able to predict response: two pre-NAC LN features were able to predict pathologic complete response (area under the ROC curve (AUC) up to 0.82 [0.70; 0.88]), and another two were able to predict post-NAC LN-status (AUC up to 0.72 [0.62; 0.77]), respectively. In the analysis by a hormone receptor subtype, several potentially useful features were identified for predicting response to therapy in the hormone receptor-positive and HER2-enriched cancers.

Indexed as

breast cancerCADMRIprecision medicineradiomics

Identifiers

PMID31592438
PMCPMC6768440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.