ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2019
Noninvasive Monitoring of Allograft Rejection Using a Novel Epidermal Sampling Technique.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic Rejection in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (fVCA).Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Review
- Molecular Signature Associated With Acute Rejection in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.Transplantation direct · 2024Article
- The 2020 Facial Transplantation Update: A 15-Year Compendium.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- Xenotransplantation: Current Challenges and Emerging Solutions.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite promising short- and long-term results to date in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), acute rejection remains the most common major complication in recipients. Currently, diagnosis of acute rejection relies on clinical inspection correlated with histopathological analysis. However, disagreement exists regarding the value of full-thickness skin and mucosal biopsies and histopathology remains semiquantitative, subject to sampling bias, and prone to intra- and inter-observer variabilities. Additionally, biopsies may cause infection, scarring, and/or potentially incite rejection through immune activation after injury. Noninvasive methods to diagnose rejection represent a critical unmet need for the emerging field of VCA. Here, we propose a novel technique utilizing skin stripping of the epidermis and subsequent molecular analysis to detect known markers of acute rejection. Using a small animal VCA model, we sought to validate our epidermal sampling technique as a noninvasive diagnostic test for acute rejection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.