ReviewPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2019
Pros, cons and future perspectives - three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease.
Review in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results from an international multi-center prospective registry of cardiac catheterizations and percutaneous cardiac interventions guided with three-dimensional imaging.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2026Article
- A single vein approach for percutaneous self-expanding valve implantation: report of two cases.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Multimodality 3D image fusion with live fluoroscopy reduces radiation dose during catheterization of congenital heart defects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility of airway segmentation from three-dimensional rotational angiography.Cardiology journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Step changes in angiographic imaging are not commonplace. Since the move from analogue to digital and flat detector plates, two-dimensional imaging technology has certainly evolved but not jumped forward. Of all the routine imaging techniques used in cardiology, angiography has been the last modality to embrace the third dimension. Although the development of rotational angiography was initially for the benefit of neuroimaging and fusion of cross sectional datasets was aimed at the treatment of descending aortic pathology, interventional physicians in congenital and structural cardiology have immersed themselves in this technology over the last 10 years. Like many disruptive technologies, its introduction has divided opinion. We aimed to explore the mindset of those in the field of interventional cardiology who are driving imaging forward. These structured interviews recorded during the 21
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.