Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31592196›Full record

ArticleMed one2019

Engineering Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles as Vehicles for Precision Nanomedicine.

Amber Gonda, Nanxia Zhao, Jay V Shah, Hannah R Calvelli, Harini Kantamneni, Nicola L Francis, Vidya Ganapathy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Med one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Inhalable perfluorocarbon RNA nanocapsules overcome biological barriers to treat lung metastases.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Nanomaterial application for protein delivery in bone regeneration therapy.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amber GondaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 599 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Nanxia ZhaoDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 98 Brett Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Jay V ShahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 599 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Hannah R CalvelliDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Harini KantamneniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 599 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Nicola L FrancisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 599 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Vidya GanapathyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 599 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Rare earth nanoprobes for optical imaging and disease tracking (C3i)R01EB018378 · NIBIB · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI GANAPATHY, VIDYA, MOGHE, PRABHAS V · 2014 to 2022
$4.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a nascent and emerging field that holds great potential for precision oncology, nanotechnology has been envisioned to improve drug delivery and imaging capabilities through precise and efficient tumor targeting, safely sparing healthy normal tissue. In the clinic, nanoparticle formulations such as the first-generation Abraxane® in breast cancer, Doxil® for sarcoma, and Onivyde® for metastatic pancreatic cancer, have shown advancement in drug delivery while improving safety profiles. However, effective accumulation of nanoparticles at the tumor site is sub-optimal due to biological barriers that must be overcome. Nanoparticle delivery and retention can be altered through systematic design considerations in order to enhance passive accumulation or active targeting to the tumor site. In tumor niches where passive targeting is possible, modifications in the size and charge of nanoparticles play a role in their tissue accumulation. For niches in which active targeting is required, precision oncology research has identified targetable biomarkers, with which nanoparticle design can be altered through bioconjugation using antibodies, peptides, or small molecule agonists and antagonists. This review is structured to provide a better understanding of nanoparticle engineering design principles with emphasis on overcoming tumor-specific biological barriers.

Indexed as

cancernano-bio interactionsnanomedicinenanoparticlesnanotechnologytargetingtheranostic

Identifiers

PMID31592196
PMCPMC6779336
OpenAlexW2981154656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.