Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31592078›Full record

ArticleHepatology communications2019

Development of a Plasma Screening Panel for Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Using Metabolomics.

Richard D Khusial, Catherine E Cioffi, Shelley A Caltharp, Alyssa M Krasinskas, Adina Alazraki, Jack Knight-Scott, Rebecca Cleeton, Eduardo Castillo-Leon, Dean P Jones, Bridget Pierpont and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine Learning in Nutrition Research.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard D KhusialDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy Mercer University Atlanta GA.
Catherine E CioffiNutrition and Health Sciences, Laney Graduate School Emory University Atlanta GA.
Shelley A CaltharpChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta GA.
Alyssa M KrasinskasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.
Adina AlazrakiChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta GA.
Jack Knight-ScottChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta GA.
Rebecca CleetonDepartment of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.
Eduardo Castillo-LeonDepartment of Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.
Dean P JonesDepartment of Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.
Bridget PierpontDepartment of Pediatrics Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.
Sonia CaprioDepartment of Pediatrics Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.
Nicola SantoroDepartment of Pediatrics Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.
Ayman AkilDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy Mercer University Atlanta GA.
Miriam B VosNutrition and Health Sciences, Laney Graduate School Emory University Atlanta GA.
Emory University · USYale University · USChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta · USMercer University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Diabetes Research CenterP30DK045735 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Richard A Flavell · 1993 to 2026
$44.0M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
METABOLIC PREDICTORS AND MARKERS OF CHILDHOOD OBESITYR01HD028016 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPRIO, SONIA · 1991 to 2024
$8.9M
National Exposure Assessment Laboratory at EmoryU2CES026560 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, GARY W · 2015 to 2015
$8.3M
Pathogenesis of youth onset pre-diabetes and Type 2 diabetesR01DK111038 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPRIO, SONIA · 2016 to 2025
$7.0M
Mechanisms of Obesity and Its Metabolic Complications in Youth.R01DK114504 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTORO, NICOLA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Anti-LPS antibody for Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseR21HD089056 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI VOS, MIRIAM B. · 2016 to 2017
$429k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD028016NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD089056NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK045735NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111038NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114504NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in children, but diagnosis is challenging due to limited availability of noninvasive biomarkers. Machine learning applied to high-resolution metabolomics and clinical phenotype data offers a novel framework for developing a NAFLD screening panel in youth. Here, untargeted metabolomics by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was performed on plasma samples from a combined cross-sectional sample of children and adolescents ages 2-25 years old with NAFLD (n = 222) and without NAFLD (n = 337), confirmed by liver biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging. Anthropometrics, blood lipids, liver enzymes, and glucose and insulin metabolism were also assessed. A machine learning approach was applied to the metabolomics and clinical phenotype data sets, which were split into training and test sets, and included dimension reduction, feature selection, and classification model development. The selected metabolite features were the amino acids serine, leucine/isoleucine, and tryptophan; three putatively annotated compounds (dihydrothymine and two phospholipids); and two unknowns. The selected clinical phenotype variables were waist circumference, whole-body insulin sensitivity index (WBISI) based on the oral glucose tolerance test, and blood triglycerides. The highest performing classification model was random forest, which had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.94, sensitivity of 73%, and specificity of 97% for detecting NAFLD cases. A second classification model was developed using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance substituted for the WBISI. Similarly, the highest performing classification model was random forest, which had an AUROC of 0.92, sensitivity of 73%, and specificity of 94%.

Identifiers

PMID31592078
PMCPMC6771165
OpenAlexW2967931269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.