Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31592072›Full record

ReviewAcute medicine & surgery2019

Advancing emergency airway management practice and research.

Tadahiro Goto, Yukari Goto, Yusuke Hagiwara, Hiroshi Okamoto, Hiroko Watase, Kohei Hasegawa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acute medicine & surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergency airway management in resource limited setting.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Airway registries in primarily adult, emergent endotracheal intubation: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tadahiro GotoGraduate School of Medical Sciences University of Fukui Fukui Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-2968
Yukari GotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Nagoya University Hospital Nagoya Aichi Japan.
Yusuke HagiwaraDepartment of Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Centre Fuchu Tokyo Japan.
Hiroshi OkamotoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine St. Luke's International Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Hiroko WataseDepartment of Surgery University of Washington Seattle Washington.
Kohei HasegawaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USNagoya University Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center · JPUniversity of Fukui · JPUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency airway management is one of the vital resuscitative procedures undertaken in the emergency department (ED). Despite its clinical and research importance in the care of critically ill and injured patients, earlier studies have documented suboptimal intubation performance and high adverse event rates with a wide variation across the EDs. The optimal emergency airway management strategies remain to be established and their dissemination to the entire nation is a challenging task. This article reviews the current published works on emergency airway management with a focus on the use of airway management algorithms as well as the importance of first-pass success and systematic use of rescue intubation strategies. Additionally, the review summarizes the current evidence for each of the important airway management processes, such as assessment of the difficult airway, preparation (e.g., positioning and oxygenation), intubation methods (e.g., rapid sequence intubation), medications (e.g., premedications, sedatives, and neuromuscular blockades), devices (e.g., direct and video laryngoscopy and supraglottic devises), and rescue intubation strategies (e.g., airway adjuncts and rescue intubators), as well as the airway management in distinct patient populations (i.e., trauma, cardiac arrest, and pediatric patients). Well-designed, rigorously conducted, multicenter studies that prospectively and comprehensively characterize emergency airway management should provide clinicians with important opportunities for improving the quality and safety of airway management practice. Such data will not only advance research into the determination of optimal airway management strategies but also facilitate the development of clinical guidelines, which will, in turn, improve the outcomes of critically ill and injured patients in the ED.

Indexed as

Airway managementemergency departmentrapid sequence intubationrescue intubationvideo laryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31592072
PMCPMC6773646
OpenAlexW2945657996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.