ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
Adsorption and desorption of DNA-functionalized beads in glass microfluidic channels.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monolithic affinity columns in 3D printed microfluidics for chikungunya RNA detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- A New Bioactive Fibrin Formulation Provided Superior Cartilage Regeneration in a Caprine Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrated microfluidic devices for the purification, amplification, and detection of nucleic acids are a prevalent area of research due to their potential for miniaturization, assay integration, and increased efficiency over benchtop assays. These devices frequently contain micrometer-sized magnetic beads with a large surface area for the capture and manipulation of biological molecules such as DNA and RNA. Although magnetic beads are a standard tool for many biological assays, beads functionalized with biological molecules can adhere to microchannel walls and prevent further manipulation of the beads within the channel. Here, we analyze the effects of solution composition, microchannel hydrophobicity, and bead surface hydrophobicity on DNA-functionalized bead adhesion in a borosilicate glass microfluidic device. Bead adhesion is primarily a result of adsorption of the bead-linked DNA molecule to the microchannel wall; >81% of beads are consistently removed when not functionalized with DNA. Hydrophobicities of both the microchannel walls and the microbead surface are the primary determinants of bead adhesion, rather than electrostatic interactions and ion bridging. Surprisingly, DNA-functionalized bead adhesion in a standard RNA amplification solution was virtually eliminated by using hydrophobic microbeads with hydrophobic microchannel walls; under such conditions, 96.6 ± 1.6% of the beads were removed in one 43 nl/s, 10-min wash. The efficiency of a downstream RNA amplification reaction using DNA-functionalized beads did not appear to be affected by the hydrophobicity of the microbead surface. These findings can be applied to assays that require the efficient use of magnetic beads in DNA-based microfluidic assays.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.