Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31591834›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2019

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Injectable Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin as Second-Line Therapy in the Management of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nuzhat Noureen, Saadia Khan, Asim Khursheed, Imran Iqbal, Moallah Maryam, Syed Muhammad Sharib, Neeta Maheshwary

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Efficacy of intravenous levetiracetam versus phenytoin in convulsive status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nuzhat NoureenDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, The Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health Multan, Multan, Pakistan. drnuzhatrana@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-4650
Saadia KhanDepartment of Paediatrics, The Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health Multan, Multan, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-9945
Asim KhursheedPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health Multan, Multan, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-9394
Imran IqbalDepartment of Paediatrics, The Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health Multan, Multan, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0636-5396
Moallah MaryamDepartment of Paediatrics, The Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health Multan, Multan, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5966-3760
Syed Muhammad SharibMedical Affairs Department, Hilton Pharma Pvt Ltd, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-8950
Neeta MaheshwaryMedical Affairs Department, Hilton Pharma Pvt Ltd, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2096-3579
Khawaja Farid Social Security Hospital · PKInstitute of Child Health · INUniversity of Karachi · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere is sparsity of quality evidence for the use of drugs after first-line benzodiazepines in convulsive status epilepticus in children. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous levetiracetam versus intravenous phenytoin as second-line drugs in the management of generalized convulsive status epilepticus in children.

methodsThis open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Emergency Department of The Children's Hospital and The Institute of Child Health, Multan, Pakistan over a period of 4 years and 6 months from January 2014 to June 2018. This study included 600 children with generalized convulsive status epilepticus: 300 in the 40 mg/kg levetiracetam group, and 300 in the 20 mg/kg phenytoin group. Cessation of a clinical seizure (seizure cessation rate) within 30 minutes after the end of drug administration was the primary outcome in this study, and the presence or absence of adverse effects was noted as the secondary outcome. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 20.0).

resultsThe children in the levetiracetam and phenytoin were aged 3.5±0.2 and 3.4±0.2 years (mean±SD), respectively, their seizure durations before the start of treatment were 25.1±0.6 and 23.8±0.4 minutes, and their treatment efficacies were 278/300 (92.7%) and 259/300 (83.3%). Levetiracetam was significantly more effective than phenytoin (

conclusionsLevetiracetam is significantly more effective than phenytoin for the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children who have failed to respond to benzodiazepines.

Indexed as

childrenconvulsive status epilepticusintravenous levetiracetamintravenous phenytoin

Identifiers

PMID31591834
PMCPMC6785465
OpenAlexW2967618038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.