ArticleNeurocritical care2020
Combined Treatment with Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statins Improves Neurological Outcomes Following Experimental Cardiac Arrest in Mice.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal ischemia due to cardiac arrest (CA) followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) causes significant neuronal damage in vulnerable areas in the brain. Currently, a majority of patients eventually die after successful CPR due to neurological injury. Statins have pleiotropic effects including anti-inflammatory and/or antioxidant responses. These pleiotropic effects can have a beneficial role in the post-CPR phase. We tested whether two different types of statins, hydrophilic pravastatin and lipophilic simvastatin, attenuated neurological injury following CA/CPR. The efficacy of pravastatin and simvastatin combination treatment was also assessed.
methodsIsoflurane-anesthetized adult male wild-type C57Bl/6 mice subjected to 8-min CA/CPR were randomized into four groups: control, 2 mg/kg pravastatin, 20 mg/kg simvastatin, or a combination of 3 mg/kg pravastatin and 10 mg/kg simvastatin. Neurobehavioral assessment and histological analyses were performed to assess overall general health condition and neuronal injury, respectively.
resultsCombination treatment with pravastatin and simvastatin significantly reduced neuronal injury in the striatum and hippocampus, reduced cerebral edema, and improved general health at 4 days after CA/CPR. Combination statin treatment upregulated endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA in the brain. Pravastatin alone, but not simvastatin alone, improved general health after CA/CPR. Pravastatin was less potent than simvastatin at reducing neuronal injury in the brain.
conclusionCombination treatment with two different types of statins at the correct dose may be a promising approach to neuroprotection following CA/CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.