Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31591664›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2019

Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review.

Damien Combes, Romain Lancigu, Patrick Desbordes de Cepoy, Filippo Caporilli-Razza, Laurent Hubert, Louis Rony, Christophe Aubé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging update in arthroplasty.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Damien CombesRadiology Department, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France. Damien.Combes@chu-angers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4074-0770
Romain LanciguOrthopedic and Trauma Unit, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.
Patrick Desbordes de CepoyRadiology Department, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.
Filippo Caporilli-RazzaRadiology Department, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.
Laurent HubertOrthopedic and Trauma Unit, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.
Louis RonyOrthopedic and Trauma Unit, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.
Christophe AubéRadiology Department, Angers University Hospital, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.
Université d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, an increasing number of patients benefit from shoulder prosthesis implantation. Radiologists are therefore more often confronted with imaging examinations involving shoulder arthroplasty, whether during a dedicated examination or incidentally. Standard radiography is the first-line imaging modality in the follow-up of these implants, before the possible use of cross-sectional imaging modalities (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), ultrasound, or nuclear medicine examinations. Shoulder arthroplasties are divided into three categories: reverse shoulder arthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, and partial shoulder joint replacement (including humeral hemiarthroplasty and humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty). Each of these prostheses can present complications, either shared by all types of arthroplasty or specific to each. Infection, periprosthetic fractures, humeral component loosening, heterotopic ossification, implant failure, and nerve injury can affect all types of prostheses. Instability, scapular notching, and acromial fractures can be identified after reverse shoulder arthroplasty implantation. Glenoid component loosening and rotator cuff tear are specific complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. Progressive wear of the native glenoid is the only specific complication observed in partial shoulder joint replacement. Knowledge of different types of shoulder prostheses and their complications' radiological signs is crucial for the radiologist to initiate prompt and adequate management.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyComplicationsImagingShoulder

Identifiers

PMID31591664
PMCPMC6779685
OpenAlexW2979339453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.