ArticleNature neuroscience2019
Internal models of sensorimotor integration regulate cortical dynamics.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Increasing the cognitive demand of upper-limb psychomotor tasks increases the perception of effort.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Manifolds in the Medial Premotor Cortex During Switching From Attending to Tapping to a Metronome.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Rethinking the centrality of brain areas in understanding functional organization.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Early emergence of perceptual biases in the secondary somatosensory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Manifold properties in the macaque medial premotor cortex during switching from attending to tapping to a metronome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Control Principles of Neural Dynamics Revealed by the Neurobiology of Timing.Annual review of neuroscience · 2025Review
- Neural Signatures of Cognitive Control Predict Future Adolescent Substance Use Onset and Frequency.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025Article
- Errors of attention adaptively warp spatial cognition.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Sensorimotor environment but not task rule reconfigures population dynamics in rhesus monkey posterior parietal cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Dynamic tracking of objects in the macaque dorsomedial frontal cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Stable sequential dynamics in prefrontal cortex represents subjective estimation of time.eLife · 2024Article
- Representation of a perceptual bias in the prefrontal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Perturbation context in paced finger tapping tunes the error-correction mechanism.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A transient high-dimensional geometry affords stable conjunctive subspaces for efficient action selection.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A Transient High-dimensional Geometry Affords Stable Conjunctive Subspaces for Efficient Action Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Mental navigation in the primate entorhinal cortex.Nature · 2024Article
- Keeping time and rhythm by internal simulation of sensory stimuli and behavioral actions.Science advances · 2024Article
- The mediating role of resilience and interaction anxiousness in the effects of physical activity on mobile phone addiction among Chinese college students.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Estimating Time and Rhythm by Predicting External Stimuli.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensorimotor control during overt movements is characterized in terms of three building blocks: a controller, a simulator and a state estimator. We asked whether the same framework could explain the control of internal states in the absence of movements. Recently, it was shown that the brain controls the timing of future movements by adjusting an internal speed command. We trained monkeys in a novel task in which the speed command had to be dynamically controlled based on the timing of a sequence of flashes. Recordings from the frontal cortex provided evidence that the brain updates the internal speed command after each flash based on the error between the timing of the flash and the anticipated timing of the flash derived from a simulated motor plan. These findings suggest that cognitive control of internal states may be understood in terms of the same computational principles as motor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.