SynthesisGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020
Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases.
Synthesis in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of pharmacogenomic testing for antidepressants use in primary care: a systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Implementing pharmacogenetic testing in community pharmacy practice: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Genetic-Guided Pharmacotherapy for Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic and Critical Review of Economic Evaluations.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review on the cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics in developing countries: implementation challenges.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Pooled it
- A Decade of Pharmacogenetic Studies in Jordan: A Systemic Review.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Pooled it
- Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Pooled it
- Dispensing of actionable pharmacogenetic drugs among adults receiving cardiovascular disease medications in the Northern Netherlands: A serial cross-sectional study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided dosing in improving treatment outcomes.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Cost-effectiveness of genome-guided statin treatment for hypercholesterolemia.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Review
- CYP450 Metabolizer Phenotypes in a Turkish Emergency Cardiac Patient Cohort: A Descriptive Pharmacogenomic Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided acenocoumarol therapy in atrial fibrillation: a pharmacogenomic simulation study in the chilean population.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Multinational cost-utility analysis of panel-based pharmacogenetics-guided treatment of patients enrolled in the U-PGx PREPARE study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomics-Guided Treatment in Cardiovascular Disease: An Umbrella Review.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Strategic insights into pharmacogenomics coverage: a theory-informed SWOT analysis of UAE insurance stakeholders' perspectives.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Review
- Analyzing pharmacogenetics cost effectiveness and savings across common health conditions in the United States.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Review
- Clinical Pharmacogenetics: Results After Implementation of Preemptive Tests in Daily Routine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Using pharmacogenomics to personalise drug therapy: which drugs, when and how.Australian prescriber · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of implementing pharmacogenomics (PGx) in cardiovascular disease (CVD) care.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review using multiple databases from inception to 2018. The titles and abstracts of cost-effectiveness studies on PGx-guided treatment in CVD care were screened, and full texts were extracted.
resultsWe screened 909 studies and included 46 to synthesize. Acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation were the predominantly studied conditions (59%). Most studies (78%) examined warfarin-CYP2C9/VKORC1 or clopidogrel-CYP2C19. A payer's perspective was commonly used (39%) for cost calculations, and most studies (46%) were US-based. The majority (67%) of the studies found PGx testing to be cost-effective in CVD care, but cost-effectiveness varied across drugs and conditions. Two studies examined PGx panel testing, of which one examined pre-emptive testing strategies.
conclusionWe found mixed evidence on the cost-effectiveness of PGx in CVD care. Supportive evidence exists for clopidogrel-CYP2C19 and warfarin-CYP2C9/VKORC1, but evidence is limited in other drug-gene combinations. Gaps persist, including unclear explanation of perspective and cost inputs, underreporting of study design elements critical to economic evaluations, and limited examination of PGx panel and pre-emptive testing for their cost-effectiveness. This review identifies the need for further research on economic evaluations of PGx implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.