Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31591152›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2019

Machine Learning Approaches to Improve Three Basic Plant Phenotyping Tasks Using Three-Dimensional Point Clouds.

Illia Ziamtsov, Saket Navlakha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Deep learning in plant phenotyping: the first ten years.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Illia ZiamtsovThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Integrative Biology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037.
Saket NavlakhaThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Integrative Biology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037 navlakha@salk.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5505-9718

Funding

CRCNS: Common algorithmic strategies used by the brain for labeling points in high-dimensional spaceR01DC017695 · NIDCD · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI NAVLAKHA, SAKET · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing automated methods to efficiently process large volumes of point cloud data remains a challenge for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenotyping applications. Here, we describe the development of machine learning methods to tackle three primary challenges in plant phenotyping: lamina/stem classification, lamina counting, and stem skeletonization. For classification, we assessed and validated the accuracy of our methods on a dataset of 54 3D shoot architectures, representing multiple growth conditions and developmental time points for two Solanaceous species, tomato (

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningAlgorithmsEnvironmentNicotianaPhenotypePlant LeavesPlant RootsPlantsPlant ShootsPlant StemsReproducibility of ResultsSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID31591152
PMCPMC6878014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.