Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31590903›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice2019

Vaccination Management of Beef Cattle: Delayed Vaccination and Endotoxin Stacking.

John T Richeson, Heather D Hughes, Paul R Broadway, Jeffery A Carroll

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Challenges in Veterinary Vaccine Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John T RichesonDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, WTAMU Box 60998, Canyon, TX 79016, USA. Electronic address: jricheson@wtamu.edu.
Heather D HughesSciWrite Consulting, PO Box 1041, Canyon, TX 79015, USA.
Paul R BroadwayUSDA-ARS Livestock Issues Unit, 1604 East FM 1294, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA.
Jeffery A CarrollUSDA-ARS Livestock Issues Unit, 1604 East FM 1294, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA.
Issues Research · USWest Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is a critical component of cattle health management. Effective cattle vaccine programs should consider the timing of vaccination in relation to expected disease challenge, risk for wild-type exposure of various bovine pathogens, and host factors during vaccination. Nearly all consulting veterinarians recommend vaccination of stressed, high-risk calves on feedlot arrival. However, this recommendation fails to consider several factors associated with vaccine efficiency. Further research evaluating vaccine interactions in stressed cattle and potential additive effects of endotoxin from multiple bacterin administration may reveal new evidence-based vaccination guidelines for cattle in the various segments of beef and dairy production systems.

Indexed as

Red MeatAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesVaccinationViral VaccinesViral VaccinesBovine respiratory diseaseCattleEndotoxinVaccination management

Identifiers

PMID31590903
PMCPMC7125876
OpenAlexW2977554966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.