Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31590900›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice2019

Nutraceuticals: An Alternative Strategy for the Use of Antimicrobials.

Michael A Ballou, Emily M Davis, Benjamin A Kasl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of feeding CLOSTAT (Translational animal science · 2023
    Article
  12. The Role of YeastAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. The effect of supplementing CLOSTAT 500 (Translational animal science · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. UHPLC-ESI-QMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. AAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A BallouDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA. Electronic address: michael.ballou@ttu.edu.
Emily M DavisDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Benjamin A KaslDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock industries strive to improve the health of their animals and, in the future, they are going to be required to do this with a continued reduction in antimicrobial use. Nutraceuticals represent a group of compounds that may help fill that void because they exert some health benefits when supplemented to livestock. This review is focused on the mechanisms of action, specifically related to the immune responses and health of ruminants. The nutraceutical classes discussed include probiotics, prebiotics, phytonutrients (essential oils and spices), and polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietary SupplementsAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCattleImmune SystemPrebioticsProbioticsAnti-Infective AgentsPrebioticsHealthImmuneNutraceuticalPhytonutrientPolyunsaturated fatty acidPrebioticProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID31590900
PMCPMC7127241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.