Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31590664›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019

Machine learning in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: basic concepts and applications.

Tim Leiner, Daniel Rueckert, Avan Suinesiaputra, Bettina Baeßler, Reza Nezafat, Ivana Išgum, Alistair A Young

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tim LeinerDepartment of Radiology | E.01.132, Utrecht University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. T.Leiner@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1885-5499
Daniel RueckertBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Avan SuinesiaputraDepartment of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bettina BaeßlerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Reza NezafatDepartment of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ivana IšgumImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Alistair A YoungDepartment of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

Cardiovascular MRI Characterization of the Arrhythmogenic Heart in Nonischemic CardiomyopathyR01HL129185 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NEZAFAT, REZA · 2015 to 2024
$6.4M
The Cardiac Atlas ProjectR01HL121754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCCULLOCH, ANDREW D., OMENS, JEFFREY H. · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
Myocardial Tissue Characterization with MR Relaxometry in Heart FailureR01HL129157 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NEZAFAT, REZA · 2017 to 2020
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121754NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL129157NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL129185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is making a dramatic impact on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in many ways. This review seeks to highlight the major areas in CMR where ML, and deep learning in particular, can assist clinicians and engineers in improving imaging efficiency, quality, image analysis and interpretation, as well as patient evaluation. We discuss recent developments in the field of ML relevant to CMR in the areas of image acquisition & reconstruction, image analysis, diagnostic evaluation and derivation of prognostic information. To date, the main impact of ML in CMR has been to significantly reduce the time required for image segmentation and analysis. Accurate and reproducible fully automated quantification of left and right ventricular mass and volume is now available in commercial products. Active research areas include reduction of image acquisition and reconstruction time, improving spatial and temporal resolution, and analysis of perfusion and myocardial mapping. Although large cohort studies are providing valuable data sets for ML training, care must be taken in extending applications to specific patient groups. Since ML algorithms can fail in unpredictable ways, it is important to mitigate this by open source publication of computational processes and datasets. Furthermore, controlled trials are needed to evaluate methods across multiple centers and patient groups.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial Perfusion ImagingCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary CirculationDeep LearningHumansMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSupervised Machine LearningUnsupervised Machine LearningCardiovascular magnetic resonanceDeep learningMachine learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID31590664
PMCPMC6778980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.