ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2020
Earmarked Taxes as a Policy Strategy to Increase Funding for Behavioral Health Services.
Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Securing Somalia's health: leveraging sin tax revenues to drive universal health coverage and financial protection for lifesaving care in Somalia's health system-scoping review.Health economics review · 2026Review
- A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Implementation of Policies That Earmarked Taxes for Behavioral Health.The Milbank quarterly · 2024Article
- From plan to practice: A qualitative study of public mental health therapists' session-planning practices.Psychological services · 2024Article
- Operational and organizational variation in determinants of policy implementation success: the case of policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Policy Recommendations for Coordinated and Sustainable Growth of the Behavioral Health Workforce.The Milbank quarterly · 2024Article
- A Tale of Two Taxes: Implementation of Earmarked Taxes for Behavioral Health Services in California and Washington State.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of policy implementation strategies for taxes earmarked for behavioral health services.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Advancing the science of policy implementation: a call to action for the implementation science field.Translational behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Earmarked Taxes for Mental Health Services in the United States: A Local and State Legal Mapping Study.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- A policy implementation study of earmarked taxes for mental health services: study protocol.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Tailoring dissemination strategies to increase evidence-informed policymaking for opioid use disorder treatment: study protocol.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Applying hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies in equity-centered policy implementation science.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Where is "policy" in dissemination and implementation science? Recommendations to advance theories, models, and frameworks: EPIS as a case example.Implementation science : IS · 2022Review
- Comparing two federal financing strategies on penetration and sustainment of the adolescent community reinforcement approach for substance use disorders: protocol for a mixed-method study.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Can additional funding improve mental health outcomes? Evidence from a synthetic control analysis of California's millionaire tax.PloS one · 2022Article
- Integrating Decision Science and Implementation Science to Inform Policy Decision Making.MDM policy & practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Earmarking taxes for behavioral health services is a policy strategy that many jurisdictions have implemented to increase funding for behavioral health systems. However, little has been written about these taxes, and limited guidance exists for policy makers who are pursing or implementing such taxes. This column summarizes approaches to designing earmarked behavioral health taxes, evidence of their impact, strategies to enhance implementation, and future directions for research. The column focuses on two jurisdictions: California, which imposes an additional 1% tax on all household income exceeding $1 million, and Washington State, which provides counties with the option of increasing sales tax by 0.1%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.