ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2019
Emerging role of biologics for the treatment of melioidosis and glanders.
Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glanders: An ancient and emergent disease with no vaccine or treatment on site.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Review
- Rare or Unusual Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria: Therapeutic Approach and Antibiotic Treatment Options.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diversity of Endophytes ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Epidemiology of Pathogens Listed as Potential Bioterrorism Agents, the Netherlands, 2009‒2019.Emerging infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Effective Therapeutic Options for Melioidosis: Antibiotics versus Phage Therapy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factors Governing Production of the Primary Siderophores in PathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Multicomponent gold nano-glycoconjugate as a highly immunogenic and protective platform againstNPJ vaccines · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.