Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31590512›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

Constraints imposed by zero-crossing invariance on cochlear models with two mechanical degrees of freedom.

Renata Sisto, Christopher A Shera, Alessandro Altoè, Arturo Moleti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimal Scale-Invariant Wavelet Representation and Filtering of Human Otoacoustic Emissions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Does the "Reticular Lamina Nonlinearity" Contribute to the Basal DPOAE Source?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renata SistoIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro Research, Department of Medicine, Epidemiology and Environmental Hygiene, Via di Fontana Candida, 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Rome, Italy.
Christopher A SheraCaruso Department of Otolaryngology, University of Southern California, 1640 Marengo Street, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Alessandro AltoèCaruso Department of Otolaryngology, University of Southern California, 1640 Marengo Street, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Arturo MoletiPhysics Department, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.

Funding

UNDERSTANDING OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONSR01DC003687 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christopher A Shera · 1999 to 2026
$9.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zero crossings of basilar-membrane (BM) responses to clicks are nearly independent of stimulus intensity. This work explores the constraints that this invariance imposes on one-dimensional nonlinear cochlear models with two degrees of freedom (2DoF). The locations of the poles and zeros of the BM admittance, calculated for a set of linear models in which the strength of the active force is progressively decreased, provides a playground for evaluating the behavior of a corresponding nonlinear model at increasing stimulus levels. Mathematical constraints on the model parameters are derived by requiring that the poles of the admittance move horizontally in the s-plane as the active force is varied. These constraints ensure approximate zero-crossing invariance over a wide stimulus level range in a nonlinear model in which the active force varies as a function of the local instantaneous BM displacement and velocity. Two different 2DoF models are explored, each capable of reproducing the main qualitative characteristics of the BM response to tones (i.e., the tall and broad activity pattern at low stimulus levels, the large gain dynamics, and the partial decoupling between gain and phase). In each model, the motions of the two masses are compared with response data from animal experiments.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalBasilar MembraneHumans

Identifiers

PMID31590512
PMCPMC6756920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.