Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31589991›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Model-based physiological noise removal in fast fMRI.

Uday Agrawal, Emery N Brown, Laura D Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. High-temporal resolution metabolic connectivity resolved by component-based noise correction.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Steady-state free precession for TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Uday AgrawalHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Emery N BrownHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Medical Engineering and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Laura D LewisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: ldlewis@bu.edu.

Funding

Project 4: Mathematical Modeling Studies of Anesthetic ActionP01GM118269 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KOPELL, NANCY · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
A Storage Area Network for Structural and Functional Image AnalysisS10RR023401 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE · 2009 to 2009
$2.0M
Imaging neural dynamics at high temporal resolution in sleep and sleep deprivationR00MH111748 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI LEWIS, LAURA DIANE · 2019 to 2021
$746k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023401NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM118269NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH111748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent improvements in the speed and sensitivity of fMRI acquisition techniques suggest that fast fMRI can be used to detect and precisely localize sub-second neural dynamics. This enhanced temporal resolution has enormous potential for neuroscientists. However, physiological noise poses a major challenge for the analysis of fast fMRI data. Physiological noise scales with sensitivity, and its autocorrelation structure is altered in rapidly sampled data, suggesting that new approaches are needed for physiological noise removal in fast fMRI. Existing strategies either rely on external physiological recordings, which can be noisy or difficult to collect, or employ data-driven approaches which make assumptions that may not hold true in fast fMRI. We created a statistical model of harmonic regression with autoregressive noise (HRAN) to estimate and remove cardiac and respiratory noise from the fMRI signal directly. This technique exploits the fact that cardiac and respiratory noise signals are fully sampled (rather than aliasing) when imaging at fast rates, allowing us to track and model physiology over time without requiring external physiological measurements. We then created a joint model of neural hemodynamics, and physiological and autocorrelated noise to more accurately remove noise. We first verified that HRAN accurately estimates cardiac and respiratory dynamics and that our model demonstrates goodness-of-fit in fast fMRI data. In task-driven data, we then demonstrated that HRAN is able to remove physiological noise while leaving the neural signal intact, thereby increasing detection of task-driven voxels. Finally, we established that in both simulations and fast fMRI data HRAN is able to improve statistical inferences as compared with gold-standard physiological noise removal techniques. In conclusion, we created a tool that harnesses the novel information in fast fMRI to remove physiological noise, enabling broader use of the technology to study human brain function.

Indexed as

AdultBrainFunctional NeuroimagingHemodynamicsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, TheoreticalAutocorrelationFast fMRIHarmonic regressionHRANPhysiological noiseSimultaneous multislice (SMS)

Identifiers

PMID31589991
PMCPMC6911832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.