ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2020
Early Experience With Preclinical Perioperative Cardiac Xenograft Dysfunction in a Single Program.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status of xenotransplantation from an immunobiological standpoint.Clinical transplantation and research · 2025Review
- 2025: status of cardiac xenotransplantation including preclinical models.Frontiers in transplantation · 2025Review
- Progress in Orthotopic Pig Heart Transplantation in Nonhuman Primates.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Review
- A Standardized Approach to Orthotopic (Life-supporting) Porcine Cardiac Xenotransplantation in a Nonhuman Primate Model.Transplantation · 2023Article
- Historical Review and Future of Cardiac Xenotransplantation.Korean circulation journal · 2023Review
- Preclinical rationale and current pathways to support the first human clinical trials in cardiac xenotransplantation.Human immunology · 2023Article
- The road to the first FDA-approved genetically engineered pig heart transplantation into human.Xenotransplantation · 2022Article
- The potential of genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in infants with complex congenital heart disease.Pediatric transplantation · 2022Review
- The immunobiology and clinical use of genetically engineered porcine hearts for cardiac xenotransplantation.Nature cardiovascular research · 2022Article
- Cardiac and Pulmonary Histopathology in Baboons Following Genetically-Engineered Pig Orthotopic Heart Transplantation.Annals of transplantation · 2022Article
- Progressive genetic modifications of porcine cardiac xenografts extend survival to 9 months.Xenotransplantation · 2022Article
- Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Progress in Preclinical Models and Prospects for Clinical Translation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022Review
- Blood Cardioplegia Induction, Perfusion Storage and Graft Dysfunction in Cardiac Xenotransplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- An Approach to Controlling Inflammation and Coagulation in Pig-to-Baboon Cardiac Xenotransplantation.XenotransplantationArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction (PCXD) was described by McGregor and colleagues as a major barrier to the translation of heterotopic cardiac xenotransplantation into the orthotopic position. It is characterized by graft dysfunction in the absence of rejection within 24 to 48 hours of transplantation. We describe our experience with PCXD at a single program.
methodsOrthotopic transplantation of genetically engineered pig hearts was performed in 6 healthy baboons. The immunosuppression regimen included induction by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), thymoglobulin, cobra venom factor, and anti-CD40 mAb, and maintenance with anti-CD40 mAb, mycophenolate mofetil, and tapering doses of steroids. Telemetry was used to assess graft function. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used to support 1 recipient. A full human clinical transplantation team was involved in these experiments and the procedure was performed by skilled transplantation surgeons.
resultsA maximal survival of 40 hours was achieved in these experiments. The surgical procedures were uneventful, and all hearts were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass without issue. Support with inotropes and vasopressors was generally required after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. The cardiac xenografts performed well immediately, but within the first several hours they required increasing support and ultimately resulted in arrest despite maximal interventions. All hearts were explanted immediately; histology showed no signs of rejection.
conclusionsDespite excellent surgical technique, uneventful weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, and adequate initial function, orthotopic cardiac xenografts slowly fail within 24 to 48 hours without evidence of rejection. Modification of preservation techniques and minimizing donor organ ischemic time may be able to ameliorate PCXD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.