Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31589427›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019

Solvation Free Energy as a Measure of Hydrophobicity: Application to Serine Protease Binding Interfaces.

Johannes Kraml, Anna S Kamenik, Franz Waibl, Michael Schauperl, Klaus R Liedl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomolecules · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes KramlInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI) , University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck 6020 , Austria.
Anna S KamenikInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI) , University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck 6020 , Austria.
Franz WaiblInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI) , University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck 6020 , Austria.
Michael SchauperlSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla , California 92039-0736 , United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5648-8170
Klaus R LiedlInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI) , University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck 6020 , Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0985-2299

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 4150Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solvation and hydrophobicity play a key role in a variety of biological mechanisms. In substrate binding, but also in structure-based drug design, the thermodynamic properties of water molecules surrounding a given protein are of high interest. One of the main algorithms devised in recent years to quantify thermodynamic properties of water is the grid inhomogeneous solvation theory (GIST), which calculates these features on a grid surrounding the protein. Despite the inherent advantages of GIST, the computational demand is a major drawback, as calculations for larger systems can take days or even weeks. Here, we present a GPU accelerated version of the GIST algorithm, which facilitates efficient estimates of solvation free energy even of large biomolecular interfaces. Furthermore, we show that GIST can be used as a reliable tool to evaluate protein surface hydrophobicity. We apply the approach on a set of nine different proteases calculating localized solvation free energies on the surface of the binding interfaces as a measure of their hydrophobicity. We find a compelling agreement with the hydrophobicity of their substrates, i.e., peptides, binding into the binding cleft, and thus our approach provides a reliable description of hydrophobicity characteristics of these biological interfaces.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsProtein BindingSerine ProteasesSolventsSubstrate SpecificityThermodynamicsSerine ProteasesSolvents

Identifiers

PMID31589427
PMCPMC7032847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.