ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2020
The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probabilistic tuning of attentional templates: Evidence for flexible prioritization in visual working memory.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Exploring boundary conditions of goal-driven attentional capture by affective categories: the role of prioritisation in working memory.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Identical Attentional Capture with Different Working Memory Representation Precision.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Attention Modulates Stimulus Representations in Neural Feature Dimension Maps.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Representation and computation in visual working memory.Nature human behaviour · 2024Review
- The association of targets modulates the search efficiency in multitarget searches.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Long-term memory and working memory compete and cooperate to guide attention.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Working-Memory-Guided Attention Competes with Exogenous Attention but Not with Endogenous Attention.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- What is left after an error? Towards a comprehensive account of goal-based binding and retrieval.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Incidental Learning of Temporal and Spatial Associations in Hybrid Search.Visual cognition · 2023Article
- Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Memory after visual search: Overlapping phonology, shared meaning, and bilingual experience influence what we remember.Brain and language · 2021Article
- Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Review
- How Do Art Skills Influence Visual Search? - Eye Movements Analyzed With Hidden Markov Models.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theories of working memory (WM) differ in their claims about the number of items that can be maintained in a state that directly interacts with other, ongoing cognitive operations (termed the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.