ArticleJMIR mental health2019
Use of Web Conferencing Technology for Conducting Online Focus Groups Among Young People With Lived Experience of Suicidal Thoughts: Mixed Methods Research.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of New Technologies to Prevent Suicide in Adolescence: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Partnering With Teens With Past Suicide-Related Crises: Development, Application and Refinement of Safety Procedures for Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Lived Experience Participation in Suicide Prevention Activities in Australia, a Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Cultivating participatory processes in self-harm app development: A case-study and working methodology.JCPP advances · 2024Article
- Adaptations to a patient navigation program for follow-up colonoscopy in rural primary care practices.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2024Article
- Stakeholder perspectives of family interventions for schizophrenia in Indonesia: a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024Article
- Adolescent Perception of Stiffness After Spinal Fusion Surgery.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Centering Lived Experience in Developing Digital Interventions for Suicide and Self-injurious Behaviors: User-Centered Design Approach.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Considerations for conducting and reporting digitally supported cognitive interviews with children and adults.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2021Article
- WhatsApp-Based Focus Groups Among Mexican-Origin Women in Zika Risk Area: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Data Quality.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Prioritising interventions for preventing mental health problems for children experiencing adversity: a modified nominal group technique Australian consensus study.BMC psychology · 2021Article
- Using web conferencing to engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people in research: a feasibility study.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Technology-driven methodologies to collect qualitative data among youth to inform HIV prevention and care interventions.mHealth · 2021Review
- Empowered by Intertwined Theory and Practice - Experiences From a Diabetes Sports Camp for Physically Active Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2021Article
- Article
- Practitioner review: Co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing interest in engaging people with lived experience in suicide prevention research. However, young people with suicidal thoughts have been described as a "hard-to-include" population due to time, distance, stigma, and social barriers.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate whether conducting synchronous Web conferencing technology-based online focus groups (W-OFGs) is a feasible method to engage young people with lived experience of suicidal thoughts in suicide prevention research.
methodsYoung people aged between 16 and 25 years and living in Sydney, Australia, were recruited through flyers, emails, and social media advertisements. The W-OFGs were established using a Web conferencing technology called GoToMeeting. Participants' response rate, attendance, and feedback of the W-OFGs were analyzed to determine whether the W-OFG system is feasible for suicide prevention research. Researchers' reflections about how to effectively implement the W-OFGs were also reported as part of the results.
resultsIn the pre-W-OFG survey, 39 (97.5%) young people (n=40) chose to attend the online focus group. Among the 22 participants who responded to the W-OFG invitations, 15 confirmed that they would attend the W-OFGs, of which 11 participants attended the W-OFGs. Feedback collected from the participants in the W-OFG and the post-W-OFG survey suggested that online focus groups are acceptable to young people in suicide prevention research. Considerations for selecting the Web conferencing platform, conducting the mock W-OFGs, implementing the risk management procedure, inviting participants to the W-OFGs, and hosting and moderating the W-OFGs as well as a few potential ethical and pragmatic challenges in using this method are discussed in this study.
conclusionsThe Web conferencing technology provides a feasible replacement for conventional methods, particularly for qualitative research involving vulnerable populations and stigmatized topics including suicide prevention. Our results indicate that this modality is an optimal alternative to engage young people in the focus group discussion. Future studies should compare the data collected from the Web conferencing technology and conventional face-to-face methods in suicide prevention research to determine if these two methods are equivalent in data quality from a quantitative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.