Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588758›Full record

ArticleJournal of the South African Veterinary Association2019

Risk factors associated with the occurrence of Brucella canis seropositivity in dogs within selected provinces of South Africa.

Johan Oosthuizen, James W Oguttu, Charne Etsebeth, Werner F Gouws, Folorunso O Fasina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk Assessment and Management of Brucella canis Introduction via Commercial Dog Imports Into France.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Brucellosis in humans caused byThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025
    Article
  3. Seroprevalence of Brucella canis in canines from a dog shelter in Bogotá, ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johan OosthuizenDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Johannesburg. oostej@unisa.ac.za.
James W Oguttu
Charne Etsebeth
Werner F Gouws
Folorunso O Fasina

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing population of free-roaming dogs in informal communities in South Africa may increasingly place humans at risk of possible zoonotic infections including, but not limited to, Brucella canis. Worldwide, the prevalence of B. canis infection has increased during the last two centuries, resulting in increased reports of dog and human infections. This study investigated the risk factors associated with B. canis infection in dogs in three predefined areas: Gauteng, the Eastern Cape and Western Cape provinces, of South Africa. Dogs aged 7 months and older presented to welfare organisations and breeders in the study areas were selected for sampling. A comprehensive questionnaire on dog ownership, general health and vaccination status was completed prior to sampling. One blood sample of 8 mL was collected aseptically per dog. Then, equal amounts (4 mL) were transferred to the different vacutainer tubes. The 2-mercaptoethanol-tube agglutination tests were used after validation. Fifty-two dogs out of the combined sample of 1191 dogs from the three study areas tested positive for B. canis, representing an overall occurrence of 4.4%. A binomial logistic regression model was fitted to identify risk factors associated with B. canis in dogs within the study areas. Dog age (0.371; p 0.05) and external parasite infestation (0.311; p 0.05) were significantly associated with the B. canis infection. Ownership and sterilisation need to be further investigated as possible risk factors because both had odds ratios of 1684 and 1107, respectively, in the univariate model.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrucella canisBrucellosisDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRisk FactorsSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesabortionsBrucella canisdog agedog ownershiprisk factorstube agglutination testzoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID31588758
PMCPMC6779959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.