Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588557›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Male breast cancer in the United States: Treatment patterns and prognostic factors in the 21st century.

Siddhartha Yadav, Dhauna Karam, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Hao Xie, Urshila Durani, Narjust Duma, Karthik V Giridhar, Tina J Hieken, Judy C Boughey, Robert W Mutter and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Mapping the invisible: a Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis of male breast cancer mortality inequalities across Spanish provinces, 1999-2023.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siddhartha YadavDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-4630-9903
Dhauna KaramDepartment of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System at Austin and Albert Lea, Albert Lea, Minnesota.
Irbaz Bin RiazDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hao XieDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9640-4055
Urshila DuraniDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Narjust DumaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-1773
Karthik V GiridharDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Tina J HiekenDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Judy C BougheyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert W MutterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John R HawseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rafael E JimenezDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Fergus J CouchDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Roberto A Leon-FerreDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kathryn J RuddyDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic Health System · US

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
ZESTRIL VS. VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONM01RR000585 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 1985 to 2006
$30.4M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000585NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMale breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease for which there is limited understanding of treatment patterns and prognostic factors.

methodsMen with TNM stage I to stage III breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 in the National Cancer Data Base were included. Trends in treatment modalities were described using the average annual percentage change (AAPC) and estimated using Joinpoint software for the analysis of trends. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to compare survival between subgroups and to identify prognostic factors.

resultsA total of 10,873 MBC cases were included, with a median age at diagnosis of 64 years. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 24% of patients, and 70% of patients undergoing breast conservation received radiotherapy. Approximately 44% of patients received chemotherapy, and 62% of patients with estrogen receptor-positive disease received endocrine therapy. Oncotype DX was ordered in 35% of patients with lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors. During the study period, there was a significant increase in the rates of total mastectomy, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, radiotherapy after breast conservation, ordering of Oncotype DX, and the use of endocrine therapy (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, factors found to be associated with worse overall survival were older age, black race, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, high tumor grade and stage of disease, and undergoing total mastectomy. Residing in a higher income area; having progesterone receptor-positive tumors; and receipt of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy were associated with better overall survival.

conclusionsDespite the lack of prospective randomized trials in patients with MBC, the results of the current study demonstrated that the treatment of this disease has evolved over the years. These findings further the understanding of the modern treatment and prognosis of MBC, and identify several areas for further research.

Indexed as

PrognosisAgedBreastBreast Neoplasms, MaleErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsUnited StatesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphamalemale breast cancerpatternsurvivaltreatmenttrend

Identifiers

PMID31588557
PMCPMC7668385
OpenAlexW2977373227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.