Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588481›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2019

Are children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Saudi Arabia safe at school?

Aqeel A Alaqeel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aqeel A AlaqeelDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail. a.alaqeel@qumed.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examined the safety of schools, availability of school personnel to help in diabetes management, glycemic control, absenteeism, and differences in diabetes care between public and private schools. Methods: This cross-sectional study used an online platform to circulate surveys to parents of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) attending school or kindergarten in all regions of Saudi Arabia from February to May 2019. Results: The 411 questionnaires received were completed mostly by mothers (80.8%). Limited trained staff were found to be responsible for management of diabetes at school, and parents had relatively poor perceptions regarding the care of children with diabetes at school. Glucagon availability, trained staff, possibility of contacting a treating physician during school hours, a written plan for diabetes, and parents' confidence in schools all scored low and were significantly related to school type. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was significantly related to insulin regimen.

conclusionParents had poor perceptions regarding diabetes care at school. There was no or very limited availability of glucagon kits and trained staff for management of children with T1DM. This study suggests a need to improve the management of diabetes at schools.

Indexed as

SchoolsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleParentsPatient SafetySaudi ArabiaSchool Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31588481
PMCPMC6887879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.