Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588371›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Segmentation in Neurodegenerative Disease.

Bryan M Wong, Richard W Cheng, Efrem D Mandelcorn, Edward Margolin, Sherif El-Defrawy, Peng Yan, Anna T Santiago, Elena Leontieva, Wendy Lou, ONDRI Investigators and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Age-Related Retinal Layer Thickness Changes Measured by OCT inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Quantifying Putative Retinal Gliosis in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan M WongUniversity of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Richard W ChengUniversity of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Efrem D MandelcornUniversity of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Edward MargolinUniversity of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sherif El-DefrawyUniversity of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peng YanUniversity of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anna T SantiagoBaycrest, Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elena LeontievaUniversity of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Wendy LouUniversity of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ONDRI Investigators
Wendy HatchUniversity of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher HudsonUniversity of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CABaycrest Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study assessed agreement between an automated spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal segmentation software and manually corrected segmentation to validate its use in a prospective clinical study of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD).

methodsThe sample comprised 30 subjects with NDD, including vascular cognitive impairment, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Macular SD-OCT scans were acquired and segmented using Heidelberg Spectralis. For the central foveal B scan of each eye, eight segmentation lines were examined to determine the proportion of each line that the software erroneously delineated. Errors in four lines were manually corrected in all B scans spanning a 6-mm circle centered on the foveola. Mean volume and thickness measurements for four retinal layers (total retina, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], inner retinal layers, and outer retinal layers) were obtained before and after correction.

resultsThe outer plexiform layer line had one of the lowest mean error ratios (2%), while RNFL had the highest (23%). Agreement between automated software and trained observer was excellent (ICC > 0.98) for retinal thickness and volume of all layers. Mean volume differences between software and observers for the four layers ranged from -0.003 to 0.006 mm

conclusionsDespite occasional small errors in software-generated retinal sublayer segmentation, agreement was excellent between software-derived and observer-corrected mean volume and thickness sublayer measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Automated SD-OCT segmentation software generates valid measurements of retinal layer volume and thickness in NDD subjects, thereby avoiding the need to manually correct nonobvious delineation errors.

Indexed as

automated segmentationoptical coherence tomographyParkinson's diseaseretinal nerve fibre layerretinal thickness

Identifiers

PMID31588371
PMCPMC6753973
OpenAlexW2972837473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.