ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019
Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Segmentation in Neurodegenerative Disease.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal layer assessments as potential biomarkers for brain atrophy in the Rhineland Study.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Retinal imaging and tissue analysis for frontotemporal degeneration: recent advances and challenges for biomarker development.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025Review
- Association and multimodal model of retinal and blood-based biomarkers for detection of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Age-Related Retinal Layer Thickness Changes Measured by OCT inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Quantifying Putative Retinal Gliosis in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Measurement of Foveal Retinal Thickness in Myopic Patients Using Different Display Modes on Optical Coherence Tomography: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Retinal nerve fiber layer in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Using Optical Coherence Tomography to Screen for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Article
- OCT Variability Prevents Their Use as Robust Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Retinal Boundary Segmentation in Stargardt Disease Optical Coherence Tomography Images Using Automated Deep Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Visual hallucinations and illusions in Parkinson's disease: the role of ocular pathology.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Iowa Reference Algorithm to the Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography segmentation algorithm.Journal of biophotonics · 2020Article
- A recommended "minimum data set" framework for SD-OCT retinal image acquisition and analysis from the Atlas of Retinal Imaging in Alzheimer's Study (ARIAS).Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI): Structural MRI Methods and Outcome Measures.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study assessed agreement between an automated spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal segmentation software and manually corrected segmentation to validate its use in a prospective clinical study of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD).
methodsThe sample comprised 30 subjects with NDD, including vascular cognitive impairment, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Macular SD-OCT scans were acquired and segmented using Heidelberg Spectralis. For the central foveal B scan of each eye, eight segmentation lines were examined to determine the proportion of each line that the software erroneously delineated. Errors in four lines were manually corrected in all B scans spanning a 6-mm circle centered on the foveola. Mean volume and thickness measurements for four retinal layers (total retina, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], inner retinal layers, and outer retinal layers) were obtained before and after correction.
resultsThe outer plexiform layer line had one of the lowest mean error ratios (2%), while RNFL had the highest (23%). Agreement between automated software and trained observer was excellent (ICC > 0.98) for retinal thickness and volume of all layers. Mean volume differences between software and observers for the four layers ranged from -0.003 to 0.006 mm
conclusionsDespite occasional small errors in software-generated retinal sublayer segmentation, agreement was excellent between software-derived and observer-corrected mean volume and thickness sublayer measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Automated SD-OCT segmentation software generates valid measurements of retinal layer volume and thickness in NDD subjects, thereby avoiding the need to manually correct nonobvious delineation errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.