Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588369›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

Properties of the Impact of Vision Impairment and Night Vision Questionnaires Among People With Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Myra B McGuinness, Robert P Finger, Zhichao Wu, Chi D Luu, Fred K Chen, Jenifer J Arnold, Usha Chakravarthy, Wilson J Heriot, Jim Runciman, Robyn H Guymer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of the Vision Impairment in Low Luminance Questionnaire.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Myra B McGuinnessCentre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia.
Robert P FingerCentre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia.
Zhichao WuCentre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia.
Chi D LuuCentre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia.
Fred K ChenCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia; Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Jenifer J ArnoldMarsden Eye Research, Sydney, Australia.
Usha ChakravarthyBelfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Wilson J HeriotRetinology Institute, Glen Iris, Australia.
Jim RuncimanAdelaide Eye and Retinal Centre, Adelaide, Australia.
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia.
LEAD Study Group
Centre for Eye Research Australia · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the psychometric properties of the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI-28) and Night Vision Questionnaires (NVQ-10) among people with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).

methodsBaseline responses were collected from 288 participants (aged 50-88 years, 74% female) in the Laser intervention in Early stages of Age-related macular Degeneration (LEAD) study in Australia and Northern Ireland. Psychometric properties (discrimination, ordering of thresholds, person separation, item miss-fit, and differential item functioning according to sex) were explored using grouped rating scale and partial credit models. Spearman's correlation was estimated to assess the association with measures of visual function (mean mesopic microperimetric sensitivity, best-corrected visual acuity, low-luminance visual acuity, and low-luminance deficit). The psychometric properties were then explored following recalibration of the instruments.

resultsIn this homogenous population, ceiling effects caused by relatively high levels of functional vision were evident for both instruments. The IVI-28 and NVQ-10 displayed suboptimal discrimination between levels of functional vision in iAMD and poor targeting among people with iAMD. The correlation between ability scores and measures of visual function was mild. In general, the NVQ-10 showed superior psychometric properties to the IVI-28 among these participants. No significant improvement in reliability could be gained following recalibration.

conclusionsBoth instruments were designed for populations with more severe visual loss and poorly discriminate in this cohort of iAMD. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: New instruments that can capture the subtle changes in functional vision that occur early in AMD are required to aid evaluation of emerging interventions for iAMD.

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationnight visionpatient-reported outcomesvision-related quality of lifevisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID31588369
PMCPMC6753972
OpenAlexW2973114203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.