ArticleOrthopedic reviews2019
Adjuvant therapies for the enhancement of microfracture technique in cartilage repair.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adipose mesenchymal stem cells and gingival mesenchymal stem cells have a comparable effect in endothelium repair.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- The Role of Collagen-Based Biomaterials in Chronic Wound Healing and Sports Medicine Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Differential Production of Cartilage ECM in 3D Agarose Constructs by Equine Articular Cartilage Progenitor Cells and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The classic technique of microfracture does not promote hyaline cartilage restoration. Subchondral bone perforations lead to the formation of a clot containing pluripotent progenitor cells and finally the cartilage defect is filled by fibrocartilage tissue. Researchers have focused on enhancing the quality of the newly formed tissue in cartilage defects after microfracture arthroscopic surgery. Adjuvant treatments are categorized in four main groups: scaffolds, pharmaceutical agents, growth factors and combinations of the aforementioned. Several experimental studies utilize pharmaceutical or biological agents in combination with microfracture, to improve the quality of the regenerated cartilage. The mechanism of action of the agents used is either to exert a chondroprotective effect on the newly formed fibrocartilage tissue, or to induce the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells towards chondrogenesis instead of osteogenesis during microfracture repair. Additionally, scaffolds have been used for both release of the biological agents and mechanical support of the newly formed blood clot. This review highlights current data regarding the combination of microfracture technique with adjuvant treatments in order to ameliorate the final outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.