Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588199›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent mental health2019

Adolescent self-harm prevention and intervention in secondary schools: a survey of staff in England and Wales.

Rhiannon Evans, Rachel Parker, Abigail Emma Russell, Frances Mathews, Tamsin Ford, Gillian Hewitt, Jonathan Scourfield, Astrid Janssens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rhiannon EvansDECIPHer School of Social Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-6331
Rachel ParkerDECIPHer School of Social Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.
Abigail Emma RussellUniversity of Exeter Medical School University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-6264
Frances MathewsUniversity of Exeter Medical School University of Exeter Exeter UK.
Tamsin FordUniversity of Exeter Medical School University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-4904
Gillian HewittDECIPHer School of Social Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7946-4056
Jonathan ScourfieldCASCADE School of Social Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-8158
Astrid JanssensUniversity of Exeter Medical School University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8419-0937
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/140/02Department of Health 10/3006/07Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/L002787/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent self-harm is a major public health concern. To date there is a limited evidence-base for prevention or intervention, particularly within the school setting. To develop effective approaches, it is important to first understand the school context, including existing provision, barriers to implementation, and the acceptability of different approaches.

methodsA convenience sample of 222 secondary schools in England and Wales were invited to participate in a survey, with a 68.9% (

resultsAdolescent self-harm is an important concern for senior management and teachers. However, emotional health and well-being is the primary health priority for schools. Health services, such as Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, and on-site counselling are the main approaches schools currently use to address adolescent self-harm, with counselling cited as the most useful provision. Fifty-two per cent of schools have received some staff training on adolescent self-harm, although only 22% rated the adequacy of this training as high. Where schools do not have existing provision, respondents stated that they would like staff training, specialist student training, external speakers, posters and assemblies, although the latter four options were infrequently ranked as the most useful approaches. Key barriers to addressing adolescent self-harm were: lack of time in the curriculum; lack of resources; lack of staff training and time; and fear of encouraging self-harm amongst adolescents.

conclusionsAdolescent self-harm is a priority for schools. Intervention might focus on increasing the availability of training to teaching staff.

Indexed as

Adolescenceinterventionschoolself‐harmself‐injury

Identifiers

PMID31588199
PMCPMC6767699
OpenAlexW2900119426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.