Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588172›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2019

Evaluation of antioxidant treatments for the modulation of macrophage function in the context of retinal degeneration.

Sarah Elbaz-Hayoun, Batya Rinsky, Shira Hagbi-Levi, Michelle Grunin, Tammy HayaYedid, Itay Chowers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Elbaz-HayounDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, and the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine.
Batya RinskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, and the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine.
Shira Hagbi-LeviDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, and the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine.
Michelle GruninDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, and the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine.
Tammy HayaYedid
Itay ChowersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, and the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine.
Hadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Oxidative stress and macrophages have been implicated in the pathogenesis of atrophic and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (aAMD and nvAMD). It is unclear whether oxidative injury mediates macrophage involvement in AMD. We aimed to investigate the effect of antioxidant treatments on human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) from patients with AMD in models for the disease. Methods: Four antioxidant treatments were evaluated (G1: lutein + zeaxanthin, G2: lutein + zeaxanthin and zinc, G3: lutein + zeaxanthin, zinc, Lyc-O-Mato, and carnosic acid, G4: lutein + zeaxanthin, carnosic acid, and beta-carotene, G5: olive oil as vehicle control). The compounds were added to the culture medium of M1 (interferon-gamma [IFN-Ɣ] and Results: The G3 treatment reduced M2a hMDMs-associated sprouting in the CSA compared to the untreated group (n=7, -1.52-fold, p=0.05). Conversely, the G2 treatment was associated with an increased neurotoxic effect of M2a hMDMs in the retinal explant assay compared to the control group (n=7, 1.37-fold, p=0.047), as well as compared to the G3 treatment group (1.46-fold, p=0.01). The G4 treatment was also associated with increased cytotoxicity compared to the control group (1.48-fold, p=0.004), and compared to the G3 treatment group (1.58-fold, p=0.001). In the in vivo light damage model, mice (n=8) supplemented with G2, G3, and G4 had decreased levels of oxidative injury assessed using 4-HNE labeling (-2.32-fold, -2.17-fold, and -2.18-fold, respectively, p<0.05 for all comparisons). None of the treatments were associated with reduced photoreceptor cell loss, as shown with histology and ERG. Conclusions: Antioxidant treatment modulates M2a hMDMs at the functional level. In particular, we found that the G3 combination has a beneficial effect on M2a macrophages in reducing their angiogenic and neurotoxic capacity ex vivo. In addition, antioxidant treatments considerably reduced the oxidative stress level in light-damaged retinas. Further research is required to assess whether such therapies may curb macrophage-driven photoreceptor loss and neovascularization in AMD.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntioxidantsFemaleHumansMacrophagesMaleMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLNeovascularization, PhysiologicNeurotoxinsPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinaRetinal DegenerationAntioxidantsNeurotoxins

Identifiers

PMID31588172
PMCPMC6776439
OpenAlexW2982820611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.