ArticleIEEE signal processing letters2018
Optimal Query Selection Using Multi-Armed Bandits.
Article in IEEE signal processing letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Armed Bandits in Brain-Computer Interfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
- An Event-Driven AR-Process Model for EEG-Based BCIs With Rapid Trial Sequences.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Query selection for latent variable estimation is conventionally performed by opting for observations with low noise or optimizing information theoretic objectives related to reducing the level of estimated uncertainty based on the current best estimate. In these approaches, typically the system makes a decision by leveraging the current available information about the state. However, trusting the current best estimate results in poor query selection when truth is far from the current estimate, and this negatively impacts the speed and accuracy of the latent variable estimation procedure. We introduce a novel sequential adaptive action value function for query selection using the multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework which allows us to find a tractable solution. For this adaptive-sequential query selection method, we analytically show: (i) performance improvement in the query selection for a dynamical system, (ii) the conditions where the model outperforms competitors. We also present favorable empirical assessments of the performance for this method, compared to alternative methods, both using Monte Carlo simulations and human-in-the-loop experiments with a brain computer interface (BCI) typing system where the language model provides the prior information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.