Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588169›Full record

ArticleIEEE signal processing letters2018

Optimal Query Selection Using Multi-Armed Bandits.

Aziz Koçanaoğulları, Yeganeh M Marghi, Murat Akçakaya, Deniz Erdoğmuş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE signal processing letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-Armed Bandits in Brain-Computer Interfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  2. An Event-Driven AR-Process Model for EEG-Based BCIs With Rapid Trial Sequences.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aziz Koçanaoğulları *Northeastern University.
Yeganeh M Marghi *Northeastern University.
Murat AkçakayaUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Deniz ErdoğmuşNortheastern University.

Funding

Translational refinement of adaptive communication system for locked-in patientsR01DC009834 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED-OKEN, MELANIE · 2009 to 2024
$12.5M
ACL HHS 90RE5017NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Query selection for latent variable estimation is conventionally performed by opting for observations with low noise or optimizing information theoretic objectives related to reducing the level of estimated uncertainty based on the current best estimate. In these approaches, typically the system makes a decision by leveraging the current available information about the state. However, trusting the current best estimate results in poor query selection when truth is far from the current estimate, and this negatively impacts the speed and accuracy of the latent variable estimation procedure. We introduce a novel sequential adaptive action value function for query selection using the multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework which allows us to find a tractable solution. For this adaptive-sequential query selection method, we analytically show: (i) performance improvement in the query selection for a dynamical system, (ii) the conditions where the model outperforms competitors. We also present favorable empirical assessments of the performance for this method, compared to alternative methods, both using Monte Carlo simulations and human-in-the-loop experiments with a brain computer interface (BCI) typing system where the language model provides the prior information.

Indexed as

Misleading priorMulti-armed bandit frameworkQuery optimizationSubset selection

Identifiers

PMID31588169
PMCPMC6777547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.