Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31588086›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2020

Clinical Usefulness of Endoscopy, Barium Fluoroscopy, and Chest Computed Tomography for the Correct Diagnosis of Achalasia.

Tetsuya Akaishi, Toru Nakano, Tomomi Machida, Michiaki Abe, Shin Takayama, Ken Koseki, Takashi Kamei, Shin Fukudo, Tadashi Ishii

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Achalasia: The Current Clinical Dilemma and Possible Pathogenesis.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tetsuya AkaishiDepartment of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan.
Toru NakanoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Japan.
Tomomi MachidaDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan.
Michiaki AbeDepartment of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan.
Shin TakayamaDepartment of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan.
Ken KosekiDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Takashi KameiDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Shin FukudoDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan.
Tadashi IshiiDepartment of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan.
Tohoku University Hospital · JPTohoku University · JPTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The definite diagnosis of esophageal achalasia is established using manometry, which is performed in patients with suspected achalasia based on the findings of screening examinations, such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, chest computed tomography (CT), or a barium swallow test. However, the exact values of test characteristics in these supportive diagnostic examinations remain unclear. Methods We estimated the sensitivity and specificity of characteristic findings in the supportive diagnostic examinations for achalasia by comparing the data of a large number of achalasia patients and others with digestive symptoms. Patients Achalasia patients (n=119) and non-achalasia patients with suspected achalasia and repeated feelings of chest discomfort (n=37) who were treated in a single university hospital. Results Characteristic findings on chest CT (i.e., dilated esophagus, air-fluid level formation) and barium swallow tests were observed in more than 80% of achalasia patients but in less than 10% of non-achalasia patients. In contrast, conventional characteristic findings of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (i.e., intra-esophageal food debris, feeling of resistance at the esophagogastric junction) were seen in only 40-70% of achalasia patients. In particular, the feeling of resistance at the esophagogastric junction was observed by the examiner in only 30-50% of patients. Conclusion Intra-esophageal food debris or resistance at the esophagogastric junction on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy will be positive in only about half of patients with achalasia. Other supportive diagnostic examinations, such as chest CT or barium fluoroscopy, should therefore be included in order to avoid overlooking the disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBariumEndoscopyEsophageal AchalasiaEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedBariumbarium swallow testchest CTesophageal achalasiasensitivityspecificityupper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31588086
PMCPMC7028409
OpenAlexW2978850127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.