ReviewCardiology clinics2019
MRI of Cardiotoxicity.
Review in Cardiology clinics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Early detection of the impact of combined taxane and carboplatin treatment on autonomic nerves in patients with cervical cancer: Measurement of heart rate variability.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Detection of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma Survivors.JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Article
- Breast Radiotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity. When, How, Why. Risk Prevention and Control Strategies.Cancers · 2021Review
- Cardiac Disease in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Risk Prediction, Prevention, and Surveillance:JACC. CardioOncology · 2020Review
- Emerging Challenges of Radiation-Associated Cardiovascular Dysfunction (RACVD) in Modern Radiation Oncology: Clinical Practice, Bench Investigation, and Multidisciplinary Care.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is useful to identify systolic dysfunction, particularly when echocardiographic imaging is not acceptable because of poor acoustic windows or when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is inconclusive by other modalities and an accurate LVEF measurement is needed. Of particular advantage in cardio-oncology is CMR's capability to perform tissue characterization to noninvasively identify changes in pathologic conditions related to cancer therapy or to discriminate causes of disease that may confound presentation in cardio-oncology patients. For these reasons, there is an increasing use of CMR in the screening and surveillance of cardio-oncology patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.