Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587620›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2018

Theorising women's health and health inequalities: shaping processes of the 'gender-biology nexus'.

Ellen Annandale, Maria Wiklund, Anne Hammarström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen AnnandaleDepartment of Sociology, University of York , York , England.ORCID 0000-0002-0607-0435
Maria WiklundDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilition, Physiotherapy, Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6636-9597
Anne HammarströmInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4095-7961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the theoretical frameworks and conceptual tools we employ shape research outcomes by guiding research pathways, it is important that we subject them to ongoing critical reflection. A thoroughgoing analysis of the global production of women's health inequality calls for a comprehensive theorization of how social relations of gender and the biological body mutually interact in local contexts in a nexus with women's health. However, to date, the predominant concern of research has been to identify the biological effects of social relations of gender on the body, to the relative neglect of the co-constitutive role that these biological changes

Indexed as

FeminismGender IdentityHealth Status DisparitiesWomen's HealthCircumcision, FemaleFemaleHumansBiologyfemale genital mutilation/cuttingfeminismGender and Health Inequalityinequalitytheoretical

Identifiers

PMID31587620
PMCPMC6792043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.