Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587494›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology progress2020

Matrices (re)loaded: Durability, viability, and fermentative capacity of yeast encapsulated in beads of different composition during long-term fed-batch culture.

Jordan Gulli, Peter Yunker, Frank Rosenzweig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology progress, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Encapsulation enhances protoplast fusant stability.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordan GulliSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-7744-4545
Peter YunkerParker Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-8471-4171
Frank RosenzweigSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-0448-3188

Funding

Georgia Research Alliance GRA.Vl18.B16NASA NNA17BB05ANational Science Foundation 1743464National Science Foundation DGE-1148903National Science Foundation IOS-1656549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encapsulated microbes have been used for decades to produce commodities ranging from methyl ketone to beer. Encapsulated cells undergo limited replication, which enables them to more efficiently convert substrate to product than planktonic cells and which contributes to their stress resistance. To determine how encapsulated yeast supports long-term, repeated fed-batch ethanologenic fermentation, and whether different matrices influence that process, fermentation and indicators of matrix durability and cell viability were monitored in high-dextrose, fed-batch culture over 7 weeks. At most timepoints, ethanol yield (g/g) in encapsulated cultures exceeded that in planktonic cultures. And frequently, ethanol yield differed among the four matrices tested: sodium alginate crosslinked with Ca

Indexed as

Batch Cell Culture TechniquesFermentationCalciumCell SurvivalEthanolGlucoseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTime FactorsCalciumEthanolGlucosealginatechitosanfermentationimmobilizationyeast encapsulation

Identifiers

PMID31587494
PMCPMC7027564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.