Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587465›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Sex differences in brain connectivity and male vulnerability in very preterm children.

Nataliia Kozhemiako, Adonay S Nunes, Vasily A Vakorin, Cecil M Y Chau, Alexander Moiseev, Urs Ribary, Ruth E Grunau, Sam M Doesburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Abnormalities in cerebellar subregions' volume and cerebellocerebral structural covariance in autism spectrum disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nataliia KozhemiakoDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6450-4959
Adonay S NunesDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-2240
Vasily A VakorinDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Cecil M Y ChauPediatrics Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alexander MoiseevBehavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Institute, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Urs RibaryBehavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Institute, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Ruth E GrunauPediatrics Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sam M DoesburgDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

PAIN IN PRETERM INFANTS--DEVELOPMENT AND EFFECTSR01HD039783 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI GRUNAU, RUTH E · 2001 to 2012
$1.8M
CIHR MOP-136935CIHR MOP42469NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence indicates better cognitive and behavioral outcomes for females born very preterm (≤32 weeks gestation) compared to males, but the neurophysiology underlying this apparent resiliency of the female brain remains poorly understood. Here we test the hypothesis that very preterm males express more pronounced connectivity alterations as a reflection of higher male vulnerability. Resting state MEG recordings, neonatal and psychometric data were collected from 100 children at age 8 years: very preterm boys (n = 27), very preterm girls (n = 34), full-term boys (n = 15) and full-term girls (n = 24). Neuromagnetic source dynamics were reconstructed from 76 cortical brain regions. Functional connectivity was estimated using inter-regional phase-synchronization. We performed a series of multivariate analyses to test for differences across groups as well as to explore relationships between deviations in functional connectivity and psychometric scores and neonatal factors for very preterm children. Very preterm boys displayed significantly higher (p < .001) absolute deviation from average connectivity of same-sex full-term group, compared to very preterm girls versus full-term girls. In the connectivity comparison between very preterm and full-term groups separately for boys and girls, significant group differences (p < .05) were observed for boys, but not girls. Sex differences in connectivity (p < .01) were observed in very preterm children but not in full-term groups. Our findings indicate that very preterm boys have greater alterations in resting neurophysiological network communication than girls. Such uneven brain communication disruption in very preterm boys and girls suggests that stronger connectivity alterations might contribute to male vulnerability in long-term behavioral and cognitive outcome.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingMagnetoencephalographySex CharacteristicsCerebral CortexChildChild DevelopmentCortical SynchronizationFemaleHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornMaleneuromagnetic brain connectivitysex differencesvery preterm children

Identifiers

PMID31587465
PMCPMC7267928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.