Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587372›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2020

Measured concentrations of consumer product chemicals in California house dust: Implications for sources, exposure, and toxicity potential.

Hyeong-Moo Shin, Christoph Moschet, Thomas M Young, Deborah H Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Determination of 1,3-Diphenylguanidine, 1,3-Di-Environmental science & technology · 2023
    Article
  12. Occurrence of 1,3-Diphenylguanidine, 1,3-Di-Environmental science & technology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyeong-Moo ShinDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7001-2555
Christoph MoschetDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.
Thomas M YoungDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.
Deborah H BennettDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.

Funding

Workshop on Environmental Technology Transfer and EntrepreneurshipP42ES004699 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HAMMOCK, BRUCE D · 1987 to 2021
$50.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Household dust is a reservoir of various consumer product chemicals. Thus, characterizing comprehensive chemical profiles of house dust may help improve our understanding of residential chemical exposure. We have previously developed a method for detecting a broad spectrum of chemicals in dust by applying a combination of target, suspect screening, and non-target methods with mass spectrometry preceded by liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. Building upon a previous study that detected 271 compounds in 38 dust samples, we presented concentrations of 144 compounds that were confirmed and quantified by standards in the same set of samples. Ten compounds were measured with median concentrations greater than 10 000 ng/g of dust: cis-hexadec-6-enoic acid, squalene, cholesterol, vitamin E, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, dioctyl terephthalate, linoleic acid, tricaprylin, tris(1-chloroisopropyl) phosphate, and oxybenzone. We also reviewed in vitro toxicity screening data to identify compounds that were not previously detected in indoor dust but have potential for adverse health effects. Among 119 newly detected compounds, 13 had endocrine-disrupting potential and 7 had neurotoxic potential. Toxicity screening data were not available for eight biocides, which may adversely affect health. Our results strive to provide more comprehensive chemical profiles of house dust and identified information gaps for future health studies.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringAir PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorCaliforniaChromatography, LiquidDustGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHousehold ProductsOrganophosphatesAir PollutantsDustOrganophosphatesconcentrationdustin vitro bioactivity assaysnon-targetsuspect screeningtarget

Identifiers

PMID31587372
PMCPMC6917863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.