Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587157›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2020

Maternal cannibalism in two populations of wild chimpanzees.

Pawel Fedurek, Patrick Tkaczynski, Caroline Asiimwe, Catherine Hobaiter, Liran Samuni, Adriana E Lowe, Appolinaire Gnahe Dijrian, Klaus Zuberbühler, Roman M Wittig, Catherine Crockford

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Pawel FedurekDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. pawel.fedurek@stir.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-708X
Patrick TkaczynskiDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Caroline AsiimweBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Catherine HobaiterBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Liran SamuniDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Adriana E LoweBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Appolinaire Gnahe DijrianTaï Chimpanzee Project, CSRS, Abidjan, Ivory Coast.
Klaus ZuberbühlerBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Roman M WittigDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Catherine CrockfordDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEUniversity of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal cannibalism has been reported in several animal taxa, prompting speculations that the behavior may be part of an evolved strategy. In chimpanzees, however, maternal cannibalism has been conspicuously absent, despite high levels of infant mortality and reports of non-maternal cannibalism. The typical response of chimpanzee mothers is to abandon their deceased infant, sometimes after prolonged periods of carrying and grooming the corpse. Here, we report two anomalous observations of maternal cannibalism in communities of wild chimpanzees in Uganda and Ivory Coast and discuss the evolutionary implications. Both infants likely died under different circumstances; one apparently as a result of premature birth, the other possibly as a result of infanticide. In both cases, the mothers consumed parts of the corpse and participated in meat sharing with other group members. Neither female presented any apparent signs of ill health before or after the events. We concluded that, in both cases, cannibalizing the infant was unlikely due to health-related issues by the mothers. We discuss these observations against a background of chimpanzee mothers consistently refraining from maternal cannibalism, despite ample opportunities and nutritional advantages. We conclude that maternal cannibalism is extremely rare in this primate, likely due to early and strong mother-offspring bond formation, which may have been profoundly disrupted in the current cases.

Indexed as

CannibalismMaternal BehaviorAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBehavior, AnimalCote d'IvoireFemaleMalePan troglodytesUgandaCannibalismChimpanzeeMaternal cannibalismParental investment

Identifiers

PMID31587157
PMCPMC7080684
OpenAlexW2977301674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.