ArticleScience and engineering ethics2020
Clinical Ethics Consultation in the Transition Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Employees' Attitudes and Awareness of Code of Ethics and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Survey at a Public Tertiary Hospital in Croatia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The New Organization of Ethics Committees in Italy: What is the Future of Clinical Ethics?Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2025Article
- Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Current State and Challenges of Clinical Ethics Consultation for Prenatal Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Committee Employee Perspectives in China.Asian bioethics review · 2025Article
- Article
- Ethical issues in oncology practice: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences and expectations.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Patient participation in Dutch ethics support: practice, ideals, challenges and recommendations-a national survey.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Article
- COVID-19 underscores the important role of Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 1989, clinical ethics consultation in form of hospital ethics committees (HECs) was established in most of the transition countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Up to now, the similarities and differences between HECs in Central and Eastern Europe and their counterparts in the U.S. and Western Europe have not been determined. Through search in literature databases, we have identified studies that document the implementation of clinical ethics consultation in Central and Eastern Europe. These studies have been analyzed under the following aspects: mode of establishment of HECs, character of consultation they provide, and their composition. The results show that HECs in the transition countries of Central and Eastern Europe differ from their western-European or U.S. counterparts with regard to these three aspects. HECs were established because of centrally imposed legal regulations. Little initiatives in this area were taken by medical professionals interested in resolving emerging ethical issues. HECs in the transition countries concentrate mostly on review of research protocols or resolution of administrative conflicts in healthcare institutions. Moreover, integration of non-professional third parties in the workings of HECs is often neglected. We argue that these differences can be attributed to the historical background and the role of medicine in these countries under the communist regime. Political and organizational structures of healthcare as well as education of healthcare staff during this period influenced current functioning of clinical ethics consultation in the transition countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31587148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.