Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587143›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2019

Subcutaneous Injection of Drugs: Literature Review of Factors Influencing Pain Sensation at the Injection Site.

Iris Usach, Rafael Martinez, Teodora Festini, José-Esteban Peris

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06563648 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Local Cold Application and ShotBlocker Use in Subcutaneous Injection on Injection Pain and Patient Satisfaction

TypeinterventionalSponsorBornova No. 25 Mevlana Family Health CenterRan2022 to 2024Enrolled208ConditionsPain, Satisfaction, PatientArmsshotblocker, local cold application, ShotBlocker placebo group
NCT06693245 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Observation of Pain During the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Using Microwave Ablation, and Analysis of Related Factors

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineRan2024 to 2025Enrolled155ConditionsVascular Disease,Peripheral, Venous Insufficiency of Leg, Varicose Veins of Lower LimbArmsVAS scores of the puncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 325 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iris UsachDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Rafael MartinezDepartment of Medical Affairs, Sandoz SA PE Parque Norte, Edificio Roble, C/Serrano Galvache, Madrid, Spain.
Teodora FestiniDepartment of Global Medical Affairs, Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Holzkirchen, Germany.
José-Esteban PerisDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. jose.e.peris@uv.es.
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The subcutaneous administration route is widely used to administer different types of drugs given its high bioavailability and rapid onset of action. However, the sensation of pain at the injection site might reduce patient adherence. Apart from a direct effect of the drug itself, several factors can influence the sensation of pain: needle features, injection site, volume injected, injection speed, osmolality, viscosity and pH of formulation, as well as the kind of excipients employed, including buffers and preservatives. Short and thin needles, conveniently lubricated and with sharp tips, are generally used to minimize pain, although the anatomic injection site (abdomen versus thigh) also affects the sensation of pain. Large subcutaneous injection volumes are associated with pain. In this sense, the maximum volume generally accepted is around 1.5 ml, although volumes of up to 3 ml are well tolerated when injected in the abdomen. Injected volumes of up to 0.5-0.8 ml are not expected to increase substantially the pain produced by the needle insertion. Ideally, injectable products should be formulated as isotonic solutions (osmolality of about 300 mOsm/kg) and no more than 600 mOs/kg have to be used in order to prevent pain. A pH close to the physiological one is recommended to minimize pain, irritation, and tissue damage. Buffers are frequently added to parenteral formulations to optimize solubility and stability by adjusting the pH; however, their strength should be kept as low as possible to avoid pain upon injection. The data available recommend the concentration of phosphate buffer be limited to 10 mM and that the concentration of citrate buffer should be lower than 7.3 mM to avoid an increased sensation of pain. In the case of preservatives, which are required in multiple-dose preparations, m-cresol seems to be more painful than benzyl alcohol and phenol.Funding: Sandoz SA.

Indexed as

HumansInjection Site ReactionInjections, SubcutaneousNeedlesOsmolar ConcentrationPainPatient CompliancePharmaceutical PreparationsThighPharmaceutical PreparationsBuffer compositionPainPharmacologyPreservativesSubcutaneous injectionVolume injected

Identifiers

PMID31587143
PMCPMC6822791
OpenAlexW2977374807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.