Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587131›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2019

Impact of insect growth regulators on biology and behavior of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).

Mubasshir Sohail, Syed Saboor Khan, Raza Muhammad, Qadeer Ahmed Soomro, Muhammad Usman Asif, Bhai Khan Solangi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mubasshir SohailPlant Protection Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tando Jam, Pakistan. mubasshirsohailroy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-103X
Syed Saboor KhanDepartment of Plant Protection, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan.
Raza MuhammadPlant Protection Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tando Jam, Pakistan.
Qadeer Ahmed SoomroPlant Protection Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tando Jam, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman AsifPlant Protection Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tando Jam, Pakistan.
Bhai Khan SolangiDepartment of Plant Protection, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan.
Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology · PKSindh Agriculture University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of four insect growth regulators (IGRs) on biology and behavior of Chrysoperla carnea. IGRs were sprayed on eggs, larvae (~24-h old), and pupae at recommended doses along with their relatively low and high dose. Eggs, larval, and pupal survival were assessed along with effects on fecundity and fertility of C. carnea adults emerged when pupae were treated. IOBC (International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control) proposed toxicity scale was used to categorize the IGRs. Concerning the eggs lufenuron, pyriproxyfen, and diflubenzuron were categorized as slightly harmful (class 2), whereas buprofezin was categorized as moderately harmful (class 3). Lufenuron and diflubenzuron were classified as slightly harmful (class 2) to C. carnea larvae, while pyriproxyfen and buprofezin were categorized as harmless (class 1). Buprofezin did not affect the locomotion behavior of the larvae as time proportion spent in the treated and untreated zone was equal, while all others were affected significantly. Regarding the pupae, pyriproxyfen and buprofezin were found slightly harmful (class 2) and moderately harmful (class 3), respectively, and considerably reduced fecundity and fertility of the C. carnea adults. Lufenuron and diflubenzuron did not affect significantly when pupae were treated. Based on combined effect, the IGRs lufenuron and diflubenzuron did nott influence the significantly on population parameters comparatively. This could be helpful for the use of IGRs in integration with C. carnea towards their conservation in agroecosystem.

Indexed as

AnimalsInsectaInsecticidesJuvenile HormonesLarvaOvumPupaInsecticidesJuvenile HormonesBiological controlGreen lacewingLocomotion behaviorSurvivalToxicity

Identifiers

PMID31587131
OpenAlexW2978311020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.