Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587121›Full record

Trial reportEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2020

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for esophageal cancer invading the thoracic aorta: a questionnaire survey study.

Masayuki Watanabe, Masanobu Nakajima, Katsunori Nishikawa, Hiroyuki Kato, Hisahiro Matsubara

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masayuki WatanabeThe Japan Esophageal Society, 2-3-13 Taihei, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 103-0012, Japan. masayuki.watanabe@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0298-1597
Masanobu NakajimaThe Japan Esophageal Society, 2-3-13 Taihei, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 103-0012, Japan.
Katsunori NishikawaThe Japan Esophageal Society, 2-3-13 Taihei, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 103-0012, Japan.
Hiroyuki KatoThe Japan Esophageal Society, 2-3-13 Taihei, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 103-0012, Japan.
Hisahiro MatsubaraThe Japan Esophageal Society, 2-3-13 Taihei, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 103-0012, Japan.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · JPChiba University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocally advanced esophageal cancer occasionally invades the aorta, and hemorrhage from the esophagoaortic fistula can cause sudden death. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) enables hemostasis in such cases, and prophylactic TEVAR can prevent fatal hemorrhagic events during treatment. However, its efficacy in Japan has not been evaluated. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of TEVAR in esophageal cancer patients.

methodsThe Japan Esophageal Society conducted a questionnaire survey targeting authorized or semi-authorized member institutes of the Authorized Institutes for Board Certified Esophageal Surgeons. Patients who underwent TEVAR for esophageal cancer were identified from 19 institutes. Data on patient demographics, treatment performed, and survival rate were obtained using the questionnaire. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and to compare differences in survival rates between those who underwent TEVAR for hemorrhage and those for preoperative prophylaxis.

resultsOf the 41 patients identified, 20 patients underwent TEVAR for hemorrhage or impending hemorrhage from the esophagoaortic fistula, while 21 patients underwent TEVAR as preoperative prophylaxis. The median survival time after TEVAR was 135 days in the hemorrhage or impending hemorrhage group and 378 days in the preoperative prophylaxis group. Eighteen patients underwent esophagectomy after TEVAR. No hemorrhagic event was observed during the perioperative period. The median survival time of the patients who underwent esophagectomy was 373 days. Some patients who achieved R0 resection obtained long-term survival.

conclusionTEVAR is an efficacious modality to control a life-threatening hemorrhage from esophagoaortic fistula and helps to prolong the survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer invading the aorta.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAorta, ThoracicAortic DiseasesEndovascular ProceduresEsophageal FistulaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHemorrhageHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingAortoesophageal fistulaEsophageal cancerHemorrhageTEVAR

Identifiers

PMID31587121
OpenAlexW2979112613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.