Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31587090›Full record

Observational studyPediatric cardiology2019

Personalised Warfarin Dosing in Children Post-cardiac Surgery.

Basma Zuheir Al-Metwali, Peter Rivers, Larry Goodyer, Linda O'Hare, Sanfui Young, Hussain Mulla

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Pharmacogenomics in Clinical Practice.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Ethnic Diversity and Warfarin Pharmacogenomics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Basma Zuheir Al-MetwaliSchool of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Peter RiversSchool of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Larry GoodyerSchool of Pharmacy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Linda O'HareEast Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sanfui YoungEast Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Hussain MullaDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK. hussain.mulla@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-691X
De Montfort University · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Baghdad · IQUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warfarin dosing is challenging due to a multitude of factors affecting its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). A novel personalised dosing algorithm predicated on a warfarin PK/PD model and incorporating CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype information has been developed for children. The present prospective, observational study aimed to compare the model with conventional weight-based dosing. The study involved two groups of children post-cardiac surgery: Group 1 were warfarin naïve, in whom loading and maintenance doses were estimated using the model over a 6-month duration and compared to historical case-matched controls. Group 2 were already established on maintenance therapy and randomised into a crossover study comparing the model with conventional maintenance dosing, over a 12-month period. Five patients enrolled in Group 1. Compared to the control group, the median time to achieve the first therapeutic INR was longer (5 vs. 2 days), to stable anticoagulation was shorter (29.0 vs. 96.5 days), to over-anticoagulation was longer (15.0 vs. 4.0 days). In addition, median percentage of INRs within the target range (%ITR) and percentage of time in therapeutic range (%TTR) was higher; 70% versus 47.4% and 83.4% versus 62.3%, respectively. Group 2 included 26 patients. No significant differences in INR control were found between model and conventional dosing phases; mean %ITR was 68.82% versus 67.9% (p = 0.84) and mean %TTR was 85.47% versus 80.2% (p = 0.09), respectively. The results suggest model-based dosing can improve anticoagulation control, particularly when initiating and stabilising warfarin dosing. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationWarfarinAdolescentCardiac Surgical ProceduresChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInternational Normalized RatioAnticoagulantsCYP2C9 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C9Vitamin K Epoxide ReductasesVKORC1 protein, humanWarfarinPersonalised dosingPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31587090
PMCPMC6848240
OpenAlexW2978417737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.