ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2020
Noninvasive Detection of Colorectal Carcinomas Using Serum Protein Biomarkers.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Where do we stand with screening for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma based on serum protein biomarkers? A systematic review.Molecular oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Novel plasma protein signatures for early diagnosis and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- AI-enabled multi-omics integration in colorectal cancer: from molecular stratification to clinical translation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Digging into the Solubility Factor in Cancer Diagnosis: A Case of Soluble CD44 Protein.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Review
- Biomarkers of inflammation and colorectal cancer risk.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Rapid Characterization of Phospholipids from Biological Matrix Enabled by Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) Coated Slide Assisted Enrichment MALDI Mass Spectrometry.Analysis & sensing · 2024Article
- Stool Glycoproteomics Signatures of Pre-Cancerous Lesions and Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Biomarker Identification through Proteomics in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Characterization of Plasma Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Associated With Inflammation.Biomarker insights · 2024Article
- Proteomics: Unraveling the Cross Talk Between Innate Immunity and Disease Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Treatment Options.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Review
- Quantification of Serum Metabolites in Early Colorectal Adenomas Using Isobaric Labeling Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in risk prediction, prognostication, and therapy response assessment in colorectal cancer: current state and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Multi-Omics Approaches in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Recent Updates and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2022Review
- Construction of 2DE Patterns of Plasma Proteins: Aspect of Potential Tumor Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA major roadblock to reducing the mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) is prompt detection and treatment, and a simple blood test is likely to have higher compliance than all of the current methods. The purpose of this report is to examine the utility of a mass spectrometry-based blood serum protein biomarker test for detection of CRC. MATERIALS AND
methodsBlood was drawn from individuals (n = 213) before colonoscopy or from patients with nonmetastatic CRC (n = 50) before surgery. Proteins were isolated from the serum of patients using targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We designed a machine-learning statistical model to assess these proteins.
resultsWhen considered individually, over 70% of the selected biomarkers showed significance by Mann-Whitney testing for distinguishing cancer-bearing cases from cancer-free cases. Using machine-learning methods, peptides derived from epidermal growth factor receptor and leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 were consistently identified as highly predictive for detecting CRC from cancer-free cases. A five-marker panel consisting of leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1, epidermal growth factor receptor, inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy-chain family member 4, hemopexin, and superoxide dismutase 3 performed the best with 70% specificity at over 89% sensitivity (area under the curve = 0.86) in the validation set. For distinguishing regional from localized cancers, cross-validation within the training set showed that a panel of four proteins consisting of CD44 molecule, GC-vitamin D-binding protein, C-reactive protein, and inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy-chain family member 3 yielded the highest performance (area under the curve = 0.75).
conclusionsThe minimally invasive blood biomarker panels identified here could serve as screening/detection alternatives for CRC in a human population and potentially useful for staging of existing cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.