ArticleForensic science international. Genetics2019
Report from the STRAND Working Group on the 2019 STR sequence nomenclature meeting.
Article in Forensic science international. Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic analysis of population studies performed with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Pooled it
- DNA Profiling in forensic genetics and anthropogenetics: Techniques, databases, and ethical considerations.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Considerations for the Implementation of Massively Parallel Sequencing into Routine Kinship Analysis.Genes · 2025Article
- Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Perceptions of forensic scientists on statistical models, sequence data, and ethical implications for DNA evidence evaluations: A qualitative assessment.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Article
- Exploring STR sequencing for forensic DNA intelligence databasing using the Austrian National DNA Database as an example.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Review
- Massively parallel sequencing of 25 autosomal STRs including SE33 in four population groups for forensic applications.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The STRidER Report on Two Years of Quality Control of Autosomal STR Population Datasets.Genes · 2020Article
- Identification of sequence polymorphisms at 58 STRs and 94 iiSNPs in a Tibetan population using massively parallel sequencing.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This report summarizes topics discussed at the STR sequence nomenclature meeting hosted by the STRAND Working Group in April 2019. Invited attendees for this meeting included researchers known-to-us to be developing STR sequence-based nomenclature schemata, scientific representatives from vendors developing STR sequence bioinformatic methods, DNA intelligence database curators, and academic experts in STR genomics. The goal of this meeting was to provide a forum for individuals developing nomenclature schemata to present and discuss their ideas, encouraging mutual awareness, identification of differences in approaches, opposing aspects, and opportunities for parallelization while some approaches are still under development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.