ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019
Disparities in Electronic Patient Portal Use in Prenatal Care: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Determinants for the Usage of Digital Patient Portals in Hospitals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Digital Divide.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Women's experiences of using patient portals in healthcare settings: a rapid review.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- A scoping review of studies on secure messaging through patient portals: persistent challenges and potential solutions.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Respectful Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Portal Usage in Pregnant People of Color.Health equity · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Uptake of Patient Portals at a Federally Qualified Health Care Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Disparities in Patient Portal Engagement Among Patients With Hypertension Treated in Primary Care.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Use of Electronic Patient Messaging by Pregnant Patients Receiving Prenatal Care at an Academic Health System: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Article
- Disparities from bedside to "webside": barriers to achieving equity in telemedicine in obstetrics.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Real-Time Patient Portal Use Among Emergency Department Patients: An Open Results Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Observational
- The Role of Formative Evaluation in Promoting Digitally-based Health Equity and Reducing Bias for Resilient Health Systems: The Case of Patient Portals.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Review
- Inequities in Health Care Services Caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Using a Patient Portal to Increase Enrollment in a Newborn Screening Research Study: Observational Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2022Article
- Outpatient portal use in prenatal care: differential use by race, risk, and area social determinants of health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Sociotechnical Drivers and Barriers in the Consumer Adoption of Personal Health Records: Empirical Investigation.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Relationship Between Patient Portal Utilization and Glycemic Control Outcomes During Pregnancy.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Perspectives of Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women on Participating in Longitudinal Mother-Baby Studies Involving Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2021Article
- Enhancing Patient Activation and Self-Management Activities in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using the US Department of Defense Mobile Health Care Environment: Feasibility Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Outpatient portal use among pregnant individuals: Cross-sectional, temporal, and cluster analysis of use.Digital healthArticle
- Sudden Shift to Telehealth in COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Disparities in Use of Telehealth for Prenatal Care in a Large Midwifery Service.Journal of midwifery & women's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectronic patient portals are websites that provide individuals access to their personal health records and allow them to engage through a secure Web-based platform. These portals are becoming increasingly popular in contemporary health care systems. Patient portal use has been found to be beneficial in multiple specialties, especially in the management of chronic disease. However, disparities have been identified in portal use in which racial and ethnic minorities and individuals with lower socioeconomic status have been shown to be less likely to enroll and use patient portals than non-Hispanic white persons and individuals with higher socioeconomic status. Electronic patient portal use by childbearing women has not been well studied, and data on portal use during pregnancy are limited.
objectiveThis study aimed to quantify the use of an electronic patient portal during pregnancy and examine whether disparities related to patients' demographics or clinical characteristics exist.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of women who received prenatal care at an academic medical center from 2014 to 2016. Clinical records were reviewed for portal use and patient data. Patients were considered enrolled in the portal if they had an account at the time of delivery, and enrollees were compared with nonenrollees. Enrollees were further categorized based on the number of secure messages sent during pregnancy as active (≥1) or inactive (0) users. Bivariable chi-square and multivariable Poisson regression models were used to calculate the incidence rate ratio of portal enrollment and, if enrolled, of active use based on patients' characteristics.
resultsOf the 3450 women eligible for inclusion, 2530 (73.33%) enrolled in the portal. Of these enrollees, 72.09% (1824/2530) were active users. There was no difference in portal enrollment by maternal race and ethnicity on multivariable models. Women with public insurance (adjusted incidence rate ratio; aIRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.84), late enrollment in prenatal care (aIRR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89 for second trimester and aIRR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39-0.64 for third trimester), and high-risk pregnancies (aIRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89) were significantly less likely to enroll. Conversely, nulliparity (aIRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20) and having more than 8 prescription medications at prenatal care initiation (aIRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.32) were associated with greater likelihood of enrollment. Among portal enrollees, the only factor significantly associated with active portal use (ie, secure messaging) was nulliparity (aIRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23).
conclusionsAmong an obstetric population, multiple clinical and socioeconomic factors were associated with electronic portal enrollment, but not subsequent active use. As portals become more integrated as tools to promote health, efforts should be made to ensure that already vulnerable populations are not further disadvantaged with regard to electronic-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.