ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019
Dual-angle optical coherence tomography for index of refraction estimation using rigid registration and cross-correlation.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Multi-Source Image Registration of Porcine Body for Multi-Feature Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning for the detection of colon polyps with malignant potential: ex vivo classification using feature-enhanced optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Feature-Based vs. Deep-Learning Fusion Methods for the In Vivo Detection of Radiation Dermatitis Using Optical Coherence Tomography, a Feasibility Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Long-range frequency-domain optical delay line based on a spinning tilted mirror for low-cost ocular biometry.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The index of refraction (n) of materials and/or tissues depends on their physical properties and serves as a source of optical contrast in imaging. The variations of the index of refraction have also been investigated for diagnostic purposes in various fields, such as hematology, oncology, etc., since they can signify disease and cell dynamic changes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been used in the past to measure the index ex vivo. However, most methodologies described in the literature are not appropriate for in vivo imaging since they require either a mirror below the sample or a complicated imaging setup and algorithms. We describe a technique that uses two images, obtained at different angles, to estimate the index of refraction and can, thus, also be applied in vivo. The index of refraction is calculated from the path-length difference observed by the OCT beam at the two different angles. When a reflector is not available, the path-length difference can be estimated using image registration and the cross-correlation of adjacent A-scans. The proposed technique was validated experimentally using both clear and scattering samples. The resulting values of the index of refraction were within ∼1 % of the expected. The main limitation of this technique is the effect of misalignment on the results, requiring the precision provided by an angular-resolved OCT system. These very promising results provide evidence that the dual-angle method should be further investigated and validated on human tissues so that it can be developed into a clinically useful diagnostic tool in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.