Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31586286›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2020

Investigating the Role of Animal Burrows on the Ecology and Distribution of Coccidioides spp. in Arizona Soils.

Daniel R Kollath, Marcus M Teixeira, Aubrey Funke, Karis J Miller, Bridget M Barker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Urban soils along the Kern River and Los Gatos Creek are hotspots forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. OptimizingmSphere · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. From soil to clinic: current advances in understandingMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel R KollathPathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, 1298 S Knoles Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-4073, USA.
Marcus M TeixeiraPathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, 1298 S Knoles Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-4073, USA.
Aubrey FunkeImaging and Histology Core Facility, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Karis J MillerPathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, 1298 S Knoles Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-4073, USA.
Bridget M BarkerPathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, 1298 S Knoles Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-4073, USA. bridget.barker@nau.edu.

Funding

Defining the Mechanisms of Recombination in CoccidioidesR21AI128536 · NIAID · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, BRIDGET MARIE · 2018 to 2019
$408k
Arizona Biomedical Research Centre 16-162415NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI128536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of knowledge regarding the ecology of Coccidioides spp. makes both modeling the potential for disease outbreaks and predicting the distribution of the organism in the environment challenging. No single ecological parameter explains the biogeography of the pathogen. Previous investigations suggest an association with desert mammals, but these results should be confirmed with modern molecular techniques. Therefore, we used molecular tools to analyze soils associated with animal activity (i.e., burrows) to better define the ecology and biogeography of Coccidioides spp. in Arizona. Soils were collected from locations predicted to have favorable habitat outside of the established endemic regions to better understand the ecological niche of the organism in this state. Our central hypothesis is that soils taken from within animal burrows will have a higher abundance of Coccidioides spp. when compared to soils not directly associated with animal burrows. Our results show that there is a positive relationship with Coccidioides spp. and animal burrows. The organism was detected in two locations in northern Arizona at sites not known previously to harbor the fungus. Moreover, this fungus is able to grow on keratinized tissues (i.e., horse hair). These results provide additional evidence that there is a relationship between Coccidioides spp. and desert animals, which sheds new light on Coccidioides' ecological niche. These results also provide evidence that the geographic range of the organism may be larger than previously thought, and the concept of endemicity should be reevaluated for Coccidioides.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAnimalsCoccidioidesEcologyEcosystemPolymerase Chain ReactionBurrowCoccidioidesEcologyqPCRSoil

Identifiers

PMID31586286
PMCPMC7050328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.